Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;46(4):1158-79.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01257.x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

Cost implications to health care payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations

Cost implications to health care payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes

Teryl K Nuckols et al. Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Objective. To assess the cost implications to payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes. Data Source/Study Setting. Medical-record data from the Community Quality Index (CQI) study (1996-2002), pharmaceutical claims from four Massachusetts health plans (2004-2006), Medicare Fee Schedule (2009), published literature. Study Design. Probability tree depicting glucose management over 1 year. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. We determined how frequently CQI study subjects received recommended care processes and attained Health Care Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) treatment goals, estimated utilization of visits and medications associated with recommended care, assigned costs based on utilization, and then modeled how hospitalization rates, costs, and goal attainment would change if all recommended care was provided. Principal Findings. Relative to current care, improved glucose management would cost U.S.$327 (U.S.$192-711 in sensitivity analyses) more per person with diabetes annually, largely due to antihyperglycemic medications. Cost-effectiveness to payers, defined as incremental annual cost per patient newly attaining any one of three HEDIS goals, would be U.S.$1,128; including glycemic crises reduces this to U.S.$555-1,021. Conclusions. The cost of improving glucose management appears modest relative to diabetes-related health care expenditures. The incremental cost per patient newly attaining HEDIS goals enables payers to consider costs as well as outcomes that are linked to future profitability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GC, Sehgal NL, Moloney RM, Stafford RS. National Trends in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, 1994–2007. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008;168(19):2088–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008a;31(3):596–615. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008. Diabetes Care. 2008b;31(suppl 1):S12–54. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:S11–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron D, Pogach L. Quality Indicators for Diabetes Mellitus in the Ambulatory Setting: Using the Delphi Method to Inform Performance Measurement Development. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2008;17:315–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms