Government food service policies and guidelines do not create healthy school canteens

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Apr;35(2):117-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00694.x.

Abstract

Objective: In 2006, the Victorian Government adopted the School Canteens and other school Food Services (SCFS) Policy that bans the sale of sweet drinks and confectionary and recommends the proportions of menu items based on a traffic light system of food classification. This study aims to determine whether compliance with the policy improves the nutritional profile of the menus.

Methods: Items from food service menus were assessed for compliance with the SCFS policy and categorised as 'everyday' ('green'), 'select carefully' ('amber') or 'occasionally' ('red') (n=106). Profile analysis assessed differences in the nutritional profile of the menus between sub-groups.

Results: Overall, 37% of menus contained items banned under the policy. The largest proportion of items on the assessed menus were from the 'amber' category (mean: 51.0%), followed by 'red' (29.3%) and 'green' (20.3%). No menus met the traffic light-based recommendations and there was no relationship between policy compliance and the proportion of items in each of the three categories.

Conclusions and implications: To increase the healthiness of the school food service we recommend a greater investment in resources and infrastructure to implement existing policies, and establishing stronger monitoring and support systems.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Food Preferences
  • Food Services / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Food Services / standards*
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Health Promotion* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Health Promotion* / methods
  • Humans
  • Menu Planning / standards*
  • Nutrition Policy*
  • Schools*
  • State Government
  • Victoria