Using additional information on working hours to predict coronary heart disease: a cohort study
- PMID: 21464347
- PMCID: PMC3151554
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00003
Using additional information on working hours to predict coronary heart disease: a cohort study
Abstract
Background: Long working hours are associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Adding information on long hours to traditional risk factors for CHD may help to improve risk prediction for this condition.
Objective: To examine whether information on long working hours improves the ability of the Framingham risk model to predict CHD in a low-risk, employed population.
Design: Cohort study with baseline medical examination performed between 1991 and 1993 and prospective follow-up for incident CHD performed until 2004.
Setting: Civil service departments in London (the Whitehall II study).
Participants: 7095 adults (2109 women and 4986 men) aged 39 to 62 years working full-time without CHD at baseline.
Measurements: Working hours and the Framingham risk score were measured at baseline. Coronary death and nonfatal myocardial infarction were ascertained from medical screenings every 5 years, hospital data, and registry linkage.
Results: 192 participants had incident CHD during a median 12.3-year follow-up. After adjustment for their Framingham risk score, participants working 11 hours or more per day had a 1.67-fold (95% CI, 1.10- to 2.55-fold) increased risk for CHD compared with participants working 7 to 8 hours per day. Adding working hours to the Framingham risk score led to a net reclassification improvement of 4.7% (P = 0.034) due to better identification of persons who later developed CHD (sensitivity gain).
Limitation: The findings may not be generalizable to populations with a larger proportion of high-risk persons and were not validated in an independent cohort.
Conclusion: Information on working hours may improve risk prediction of CHD on the basis of the Framingham risk score in low-risk, working populations.
Primary funding source: Medical Research Council; British Heart Foundation; Bupa Foundation; and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health.
© 2011 American College of Physicians
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Enhancing the Framingham Risk Score for coronary heart disease by adding information on working hours.Evid Based Med. 2012 Apr;17(2):64. doi: 10.1136/ebm-2011-100087. Epub 2011 Oct 11. Evid Based Med. 2012. PMID: 21990188 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Does adding information on job strain improve risk prediction for coronary heart disease beyond the standard Framingham risk score? The Whitehall II study.Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;40(6):1577-84. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr078. Epub 2011 May 9. Int J Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21558169 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a coronary risk prediction model for older U.S. and European persons in the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rotterdam Study.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):389-97. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22986376 Free PMC article.
-
Long Working Hours and Risk of Recurrent Coronary Events.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 6;77(13):1616-1625. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.012. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33795035
-
Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603,838 individuals.Lancet. 2015 Oct 31;386(10005):1739-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60295-1. Epub 2015 Aug 19. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 26298822 Review.
-
Evaluation of the Framingham risk score in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk cohort: does adding glycated hemoglobin improve the prediction of coronary heart disease events?Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 9;168(11):1209-16. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.11.1209. Arch Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18541829
Cited by
-
Mental Stress and Cardiovascular Health-Part I.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 10;11(12):3353. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123353. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743423 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Male Farmers Over the Age of 45: A Review of Literature.Cureus. 2022 May 1;14(5):e24642. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24642. eCollection 2022 May. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35663675 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Work Exposures and Development of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Jul 2;66(6):698-713. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxac004. Ann Work Expo Health. 2022. PMID: 35237787 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of two SCORE-based cardiovascular risk prediction models for Eastern Europe: a multicohort study.Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 14;41(35):3325-3333. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa571. Eur Heart J. 2020. PMID: 33011775 Free PMC article.
-
Association between employment status and sickness presenteeism among Korean employees: a cross-sectional study.Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jun 12;32:e17. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e17. eCollection 2020. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020. PMID: 32676195 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circ. 1998;97(18):1837–47. - PubMed
-
- D'Agostino RB, Sr, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, Wilson P. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA. 2001;286(2):180–7. - PubMed
-
- Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circ. 2002;106(25):3143–421. - PubMed
-
- Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circ. 2004;110(2):227–39. - PubMed
-
- Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts) Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14 2:S1–113. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources