Improving cancer care through public reporting of meaningful quality measures
- PMID: 21471487
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0089
Improving cancer care through public reporting of meaningful quality measures
Abstract
Historically, quality measures for cancer have followed a different route than overall quality measures in the health care system. Many specialized cancer treatment centers were exempt from standard reporting on quality measures because of the complexity of cancer. Additionally, it has been difficult to create meaningful quality measures for cancer because the disease can strike so many different organs; is discovered at and progresses through different stages; and is treated using different modalities, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Over the past decade the National Quality Forum, a nonprofit organization dedicated to bettering the quality of US health care, has endorsed measures of quality for cancer providers and patients. The Affordable Care Act of 2010, which has sections specific to cancer reporting, will also further the development and public reporting of cancer quality measures-important steps in improving the delivery of cancer care.
Similar articles
-
Reporting of quality measures in gynecologic oncology programs at Prospective Payment System (PPS)-Exempt Cancer Hospitals: an early glimpse into a challenging initiative.Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 26. Gynecol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23718934
-
QAPI how do you measure up?: Preparing for public reporting in hospice: an overview for success.Home Healthc Nurse. 2011 Jan;29(1):45-51; quiz 52-3. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0b013e3181fe4418. Home Healthc Nurse. 2011. PMID: 21160343
-
An opportunity for coordinated cancer care: intersection of health care reform, primary care providers, and cancer patients.Cancer J. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):593-9. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181feee9a. Cancer J. 2010. PMID: 21131791 Review.
-
The implications of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act on cancer care delivery.Cancer. 2011 Apr 15;117(8):1564-74. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25725. Epub 2010 Nov 8. Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21472704 Review.
-
Medicare program; hospital inpatient value-based purchasing program. Final rule.Fed Regist. 2011 May 6;76(88):26490-547. Fed Regist. 2011. PMID: 21548401
Cited by
-
Stakeholder Perceptions of Key Aspects of High-Quality Cancer Care to Assess with Patient Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;13(14):3628. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143628. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34298841 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of public performance reporting on cancer elective surgery waiting times: a data linkage study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06132-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33557805 Free PMC article.
-
Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Patient-Centered Cancer Care Measure to Support Improved Assessment of Patients' Experiences.Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):351-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 9. Value Health. 2020. PMID: 32197731 Free PMC article.
-
Facts and Fears in Public Reporting: Patients' Information Needs and Priorities When Selecting a Hospital for Cancer Care.Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):632-641. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19855050. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Med Decis Making. 2019. PMID: 31226909 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing whether cancer stage is needed to evaluate measures of hospital surgical performance.J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):66-71. doi: 10.1111/jep.13168. Epub 2019 May 9. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020. PMID: 31069903 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
