Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 May 1;18(3):276-81.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000026.

Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets?

Julie Chan  1 , Kaveh G Shojania, Anthony C Easty, Edward E Etchells
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does user-centred design affect the efficiency, usability and safety of CPOE order sets?

Julie Chan et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Application of user-centred design principles to Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems may improve task efficiency, usability or safety, but there is limited evaluative research of its impact on CPOE systems.

Objective: We evaluated the task efficiency, usability, and safety of three order set formats: our hospital's planned CPOE order sets (CPOE Test), computer order sets based on user-centred design principles (User Centred Design), and existing pre-printed paper order sets (Paper).

Participants: 27 staff physicians, residents and medical students.

Setting: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, an academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Methods Participants completed four simulated order set tasks with three order set formats (two CPOE Test tasks, one User Centred Design, and one Paper). Order of presentation of order set formats and tasks was randomized. Users received individual training for the CPOE Test format only.

Main measures: Completion time (efficiency), requests for assistance (usability), and errors in the submitted orders (safety).

Results: 27 study participants completed 108 order sets. Mean task times were: User Centred Design format 273 s, Paper format 293 s (p=0.73 compared to UCD format), and CPOE Test format 637 s (p<0.0001 compared to UCD format). Users requested assistance in 31% of the CPOE Test format tasks, whereas no assistance was needed for the other formats (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in number of errors between formats.

Conclusions: The User Centred Design format was more efficient and usable than the CPOE Test format even though training was provided for the latter. We conclude that application of user-centred design principles can enhance task efficiency and usability, increasing the likelihood of successful implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CPOE Test system General Internal Medicine standard admission order set.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre's pre-printed paper standard admission orders order set form.
Figure 3
Figure 3
User Centred Design format for General Internal Medicine standard admission order set.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1409–16 - PubMed
    1. Aarts J, Koppel R. Implementation of computerized physician order entry in seven countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:404–14 - PubMed
    1. Teich JM, Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, et al. The CDS Expert Review Panel Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan. Report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:365–76 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ash J, Stavrl P, Kuperman G. A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:229–34 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:547–56 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types