Health care reform: will quality remodeling affect obstetrician-gynecologists in addition to patients?
- PMID: 21508757
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182164a58
Health care reform: will quality remodeling affect obstetrician-gynecologists in addition to patients?
Abstract
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is a federal statute that attempts to address many fundamental problems with the current health care system including the uninsured, rising health care costs, and quality care. Quality metrics have been in development for years (by private and governmental sectors), and momentum is growing. The purpose of this commentary is to explore quality changes in the way practicing obstetricians and gynecologists will be held accountable for quality service. Two new options being explored for health care, both focusing on improving quality and physician metrics, include value-based purchasing and accountable-care organizations. Both will likely consist of universal clinical algorithms and cost monitoring as measures. For obstetrics this will probably include physician's rates of cesarean deliveries and elective inductions. For gynecology this may comprise of indications for hysterectomy with documented failed medical management, minor surgical management, or both medical and minor surgical management. It is anticipated patients will no longer be able to request obstetric testing, pregnancy induction, or hysterectomy. It is imperative we, as obstetrician-gynecologists, are involved in health care reform that inevitably involves the care of women. The expectation is that the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) will further develop evidenced-based opinions and guidelines, as medical communities embrace ACOG documents and reference these in hospital policies and peer review.
Similar articles
-
Recommendations of the IOM clinical preventive services for women committee: implications for obstetricians and gynecologists.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;23(6):471-80. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834cdcc6. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 22011955 Review.
-
Obstetrician-gynecologists' opinions about patient safety: costs and liability remain problems; are mandated reports a solution?Womens Health Issues. 2009 Jan-Feb;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Dec 5. Womens Health Issues. 2009. PMID: 19062303
-
Medicaid and Women's Health Coverage Two Years into the Affordable Care Act.Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):604-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Womens Health Issues. 2015. PMID: 26432345 No abstract available.
-
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 649: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):e130-e134. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001213. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26595584
-
Obstetrician-gynecologist as primary care provider.Am J Manag Care. 2001 Sep 25;7 Spec No:SP19-24. Am J Manag Care. 2001. PMID: 11599671 Review.
Cited by
-
Composite non-clinical interventions for a safe cesarean section rate reduction: results of a pre-post interventional study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04245-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34798862 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Robinson JC. Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations. JAMA 1998;279:144–9.
-
- Dentzer S. Geisinger chief Glenn Steele: seizing health reforms potential to build a superior system. Health Aff 2010;29:1200–7.
-
- Fisher ES, Staiger DO, Bynum JP, Gottlieb DJ. Creating accountable care organizations: the extended medical staff. Health Aff 2006;26:44–57.
-
- Lu MC. Healthcare reform and women's health. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:514–20.
-
- Ehrenthal DB, Xiaozhang J, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:35–42.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
