Flow cytometry purification of mouse meiotic cells
- PMID: 21525843
- PMCID: PMC3169279
- DOI: 10.3791/2602
Flow cytometry purification of mouse meiotic cells
Abstract
The heterogeneous nature of cell types in the testis and the absence of meiotic cell culture models have been significant hurdles to the study of the unique differentiation programs that are manifest during meiosis. Two principal methods have been developed to purify, to varying degrees, various meiotic fractions from both adult and immature animals: elutriation or Staput (sedimentation) using BSA and/or percoll gradients. Both of these methods rely on cell size and density to separate meiotic cells. Overall, except for few cell populations, these protocols fail to yield sufficient purity of the numerous meiotic cell populations that are necessary for detailed molecular analyses. Moreover, with such methods usually one type of meiotic cells can be purified at a given time, which adds an extra level of complexity regarding the reproducibility and homogeneity when comparing meiotic cell samples. Here, we describe a refined method that allows one to easily visualize, identify, and purify meiotic cells, from germ cells to round spermatids, using FACS combined with Hoechst 33342 staining. This method provides an overall snapshot of the entire meiotic process and allows one to highly purify viable cells from most stage of meiosis. These purified cells can then be analyzed in detail for molecular changes that accompany progression through meiosis, for example changes in gene expression and the dynamics of nucleosome occupancy at hotspots of meiotic recombination.
Similar articles
-
Simultaneous Purification of Round and Elongated Spermatids from Testis Tissue Using a FACS-Based DNA Ploidy Assay.Cytometry A. 2019 Mar;95(3):309-313. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23698. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Cytometry A. 2019. PMID: 30565839 Free PMC article.
-
Flow cytometric characterization of viable meiotic and postmeiotic cells by Hoechst 33342 in mouse spermatogenesis.Cytometry A. 2005 May;65(1):40-9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20129. Cytometry A. 2005. PMID: 15779065
-
Isolation of Mouse Germ Cells by FACS Using Hoechst 33342 and SYTO16 Double Staining.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2770:53-62. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3698-5_5. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 38351446
-
New horizons for in vitro spermatogenesis? An update on novel three-dimensional culture systems as tools for meiotic and post-meiotic differentiation of testicular germ cells.Mol Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;15(9):521-9. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap052. Epub 2009 Jun 27. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009. PMID: 19561342 Review.
-
Isolation and analyses of enriched populations of male mouse germ cells by sedimentation velocity: the centrifugal elutriation.Methods Mol Biol. 2009;558:299-321. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_18. Methods Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19685332 Review.
Cited by
-
The contribution of sex chromosome conflict to disrupted spermatogenesis in hybrid house mice.Genetics. 2022 Nov 30;222(4):iyac151. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac151. Genetics. 2022. PMID: 36194004 Free PMC article.
-
Stage-resolved Hi-C analyses reveal meiotic chromosome organizational features influencing homolog alignment.Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 8;12(1):5827. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26033-0. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 34625553 Free PMC article.
-
Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is disrupted in sterile hybrid male house mice.Genetics. 2013 Mar;193(3):819-28. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.148635. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Genetics. 2013. PMID: 23307891 Free PMC article.
-
DNA cross-link repair safeguards genomic stability during premeiotic germ cell development.Nat Genet. 2019 Aug;51(8):1283-1294. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0471-2. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Nat Genet. 2019. PMID: 31367016 Free PMC article.
-
Chromosome Spread Analyses of Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation.Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1861:113-129. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8766-5_10. Methods Mol Biol. 2018. PMID: 30218364 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Meistrich ML, Bruce WR, Clermont Y. Cellular composition of fractions of mouse testis cells following velocity sedimentation separation. Exp. Cell Res. 1973;79:213–227. - PubMed
-
- Grabske RJ, Lake S, Gledhill BL, Meistrich ML. Centrifugal elutriation: separation of spermatogenic cells on the basis of sedimentation velocity. J. Cell. Physiol. 1975;86:177–189. - PubMed
-
- Purification AR. culture, and fractionation of spermatogenic cells. Methods Enzymol. 1993;225:84–113. - PubMed
-
- Romrell LJ, Bellve AR, Fawcett DW. Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity. A morphological characterization. Dev. Biol. 1976;49:119–131. - PubMed
-
- Meistrich ML, Trostle PK. Separation of mouse testis cells by equilibrium density centrifugation in renografin gradients. Exp. Cell Res. 1975;92:231–244. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources