Background: Massachusetts has implemented reforms aimed at providing universal health care coverage and covers abortion through subsidized state insurance programs. Three Massachusetts abortion funds evaluated their referral processes for low-income women from April to October 2010 to learn about women's experiences applying for subsidized insurance and to identify barriers to obtaining insurance or its use for abortion services.
Methods: Follow-up interviews were conducted with 39 low-income women thought eligible for subsidized insurance at least 1 month after their initial contact with the funds.
Results: Health insurance literacy was low, and participants reported confusion distinguishing between levels of subsidized insurance. The process of applying for subsidized insurance delayed a substantial proportion of procedures. More than two thirds of the women who applied for state coverage had become insured or expected to become insured shortly, but only one third of respondents who applied were able to secure insurance in time for their abortion care. Two women were unable to obtain abortions as a result of delays. Delays also limited low-income women's ability to obtain medication abortion.
Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the process for enrolling in subsidized insurance does not currently meet the goal of providing women with coverage for abortion care (and other health needs) in a timely way. Systemic improvements are needed to ensure that enrollments are processed quickly and disruptions in coverage are minimized. Information resources should be developed to help women and their families understand health insurance and coverage of services.
Copyright © 2011 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.