Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 May;59(5):881-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03385.x. Epub 2011 May 3.

Decision-making and Outcomes of Feeding Tube Insertion: A Five-State Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Multicenter Study

Decision-making and Outcomes of Feeding Tube Insertion: A Five-State Study

Joan M Teno et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: To examine family member's perceptions of decision-making and outcomes of feeding tubes.

Design: Mortality follow-back survey. Sample weights were used to account for oversampling and survey design. A multivariate model examined the association between feeding tube use and overall quality of care rating regarding the last week of life.

Setting: Nursing homes, hospitals, and assisted living facilities.

Participants: Respondents whose relative had died from dementia in five states with varying feeding tube use.

Measurements: Respondents were asked about discussions, decision-making, and outcomes related to their loved ones' feeding problems.

Results: Of 486 family members surveyed, representing 9,652 relatives dying from dementia, 10.8% reported that the decedent had a feeding tube, 17.6% made a decision not to use a feeding tube, and 71.6% reported that there was no decision about feeding tubes. Of respondents for decedents with a feeding tube, 13.7% stated that there was no discussion about feeding tube insertion, and 41.6% reported a discussion that was shorter than 15 minutes. The risks associated with feeding tube insertion were not discussed in one-third of the cases, 51.8% felt that the healthcare provider was strongly in favor of feeding tube insertion, and 12.6% felt pressured by the physician to insert a feeding tube. The decedent was often physically (25.9%) or pharmacologically restrained (29.2%). Respondents whose loved ones died with a feeding tube were less likely to report excellent end-of-life care (adjusted odds ratio=0.42, 95% confidence interval=0.18-0.97) than those who were not.

Conclusion: Based on the perceptions of bereaved family members, important opportunities exist to improve decision-making in feeding tube insertion.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 35 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback