One-stage excision of inflamed sebaceous cyst versus the conventional method

S Afr J Surg. 2010 Nov;48(4):116-8.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this trial was to determine whether one-stage excision of inflamed sebaceous cysts is preferable to the conventional method.

Methods: A group of 166 patients underwent primary resection of an inflamed sebaceous cyst followed by 5 days' administration of antibiotics. A further 185 patients underwent conventional treatment consisting of initial antibiotic administration and incision and drainage of the lesion, followed by elective surgical excision 1-2 months later when the inflammation had subsided. Duration of antibiotic exposure, morbidity and cost were compared between the two groups.

Results: One-stage excision of inflamed sebaceous cysts decreased the duration of antibiotic exposure, reduced morbidity and is more economical.

Conclusion: This study strongly suggests that, provided cases are appropriately selected, primary resection of inflamed sebaceous cysts has advantages over conventional treatment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • China
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Drainage
  • Epidermal Cyst / drug therapy
  • Epidermal Cyst / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents