Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;33(4):634-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01343.x.

An interactional approach to conceptualising small talk in medical interactions

Affiliations

An interactional approach to conceptualising small talk in medical interactions

Pamela L Hudak et al. Sociol Health Illn. 2011 May.

Abstract

In medical interactions, it may seem straightforward to identify 'small talk' as casual or social talk superfluous to the institutional work of dealing with patients' medical concerns. Such a broad characterisation is, however, extremely difficult to apply to actual talk, and more specificity is necessary to pursue analyses of how small talk is produced and what it achieves for participants in medical interactions. We offer an approach to delineating a subgenre of small talk called topicalised small talk (TST), derived on the basis of conversation analytically-informed analyses of routine consultations involving orthopaedic surgeons and older patients. TST is a line of talk that is referentially independent from their institutional identities as patients or surgeons, oriented instead to an aspect of the personal biography of one (or both), or to some neutral topic available to interactants in any setting (e.g. weather). Importantly, TST is an achievement of both patient and surgeon in that generation and pursuit of topic is mutually accomplished. In an exploratory but systematic analysis, when this approach was applied to a purposive sample of surgeon-patient interactions, TST was much more prevalent in visits with White than African American patients. Accounts for possible ethnic differences in TST are suggested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Example 1
Example 1
11500008, 0:13–0:49
Example 1
Example 1
11500008, 0:13–0:49
Example 2
Example 2
10110008, 4:43–5:22
Example 2
Example 2
10110008, 4:43–5:22
Example 3
Example 3
10280004, 26:15
Example 3
Example 3
10280004, 26:15
Example 4
Example 4
0890004, 0:15–0:51
Example 4
Example 4
0890004, 0:15–0:51
Example 5
Example 5
10210004, 24:22–25:14
Example 5
Example 5
10210004, 24:22–25:14
Example 6
Example 6
10180010 (4:09–5.08)
Example 6
Example 6
10180010 (4:09–5.08)
Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of visits with topicalised small talk (TST) by patient ethnicity and educational attainment (N=59)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Trends in Hospital Procedures Performed on Black Patients and White Patients: 1980–1987. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994.
    1. Baron JA, Barrett J, Katz JN, Liang MH. Total hip arthroplasty: use and select complication in the US Medicare population. American Journal of Public Health. 1996;86(1):70–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beach WA. Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ ‘okay’ usages. Journal of Pragmatics. 1993;19(4):325–52.
    1. Button G, Casey N. Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies. 1985;8(1):3–55.
    1. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, Gender and Partnership in the Patient-Physician Relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282(6):583–9. - PubMed

Publication types