Measuring patient and family experiences of health care for children
- PMID: 21570018
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.01.009
Measuring patient and family experiences of health care for children
Abstract
Background: The Institute of Medicine considers patient centeredness a core dimension of quality. Several patient/family surveys exist to assess pediatric health care. The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act mandates strengthening quality measurement for children, including for patient/family experience of care.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine what instruments exist for measuring patient/family experience of pediatric health care and which should be included in the core measurement set for assessing Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) programs; to identify gaps in measurement; and to provide recommendations for measure development.
Methods: We developed a conceptual framework for measuring patient/family experience of care. We conducted a review of national measure clearinghouses and of the literature to assess validity, reliability, and feasibility of existing measures, and how these measures address the conceptual framework.
Results: We found valid and reliable instruments for measuring patient/family experience of care include the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) instruments, Promoting Healthy Development Survey (PHDS), Young Adult Health Care Survey (YAHCS), and the National Research Corporation Picker Pediatric Inpatient Survey (NRC Picker). We identified the need for matching patients with providers and groups as a barrier for widespread use of the CAHPS® pediatric clinician & group instrument.
Conclusions: We recommended to the National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and Quality Subcommittee on Children's Healthcare Quality Measures for Medicaid and Child Health Insurance Programs (SNAC) the CAHPS® Child Medicaid 4.0 and pediatric Clinician & Group Survey for inclusion in the initial recommended list of core measures for voluntary use by Medicaid and CHIP. The Clinician and Group Survey was not included in the list posted for public comment due to concerns at that time (December 2009) about feasibility. We also recommended that development of a child version of the CAHPS® behavioral and mental health survey now used in the adult population and of a pediatric hospital CAHPS® measure be considered high priorities for development in the next phase of Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act measurement activity. This phase should also explore methods to increase response rates and lower costs of obtaining consumer feedback.
Copyright © 2011 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act quality measures initiatives: moving forward to improve measurement, care, and child and adolescent outcomes.Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S1-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.02.009. Acad Pediatr. 2011. PMID: 21570012
-
Identifying children's health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: an evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process.Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.11.003. Acad Pediatr. 2011. PMID: 21570013
-
Medicaid and CHIP children's healthcare quality measures: what states use and what they want.Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.003. Acad Pediatr. 2011. PMID: 21570019
-
Advancing children's health care and outcomes through the pediatric quality measures program.Acad Pediatr. 2014 Sep-Oct;14(5 Suppl):S19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.06.025. Acad Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 25169453 Review.
-
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90. Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9776949 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Disparities in Youth and Family Experiences of System-of-Care Principles by Level of Youth Need.Community Ment Health J. 2023 Oct;59(7):1388-1400. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01126-w. Epub 2023 Apr 21. Community Ment Health J. 2023. PMID: 37084106 Free PMC article.
-
A sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial comparing web-based education to mobile video interpreter access for improving provider interpreter use in primary care clinics: the mVOCAL hybrid type 3 study protocol.Implement Sci. 2023 Mar 13;18(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01263-6. Implement Sci. 2023. PMID: 36915138 Free PMC article.
-
Patient preferences and choices as a reflection of trust-A cluster analysis comparing postsurgical perceptions in a private and a public hospital.Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2340-2354. doi: 10.1111/hex.13487. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 35833265 Free PMC article.
-
Causal Effect Analysis of Demographic Concordance of Physician Trust and Respect in an Emergency Care Setting.Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 19;13:503-509. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S334495. eCollection 2021. Open Access Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34824553 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Telephone Follow-Up on Patient Satisfaction in a Pediatric Neurosurgery Clinic.J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1255-1259. doi: 10.1177/2374373520919210. Epub 2020 Apr 19. J Patient Exp. 2020. PMID: 33457573 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
