Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;22(4):568-74.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821d09cd.

Future cases as present controls to adjust for exposure trend bias in case-only studies

Affiliations

Future cases as present controls to adjust for exposure trend bias in case-only studies

Shirley Wang et al. Epidemiology. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Self-matched case-only studies (such as the case-crossover or self-controlled case-series method) control by design for time-invariant confounders (measured or unmeasured), but they do not control for confounders that vary with time. A bidirectional case-crossover design can be used to adjust for exposure-time trends. In pharmacoepidemiology, however, illness often influences future use of medications, making a bidirectional design problematic. Suissa's case-time-control design combines a case-crossover and case-control design, and adjusts for exposure-trend bias in the cases' self-controlled odds ratio by dividing that ratio by the corresponding self-controlled odds ratio in a concurrent matched control group. However, if not well matched, the control group may reintroduce selection bias. We propose a "case-case-time-control" that involves crossover analyses in cases and future-case controls. This person-time sampling strategy improves matching by restricting controls to future cases. We evaluate the proposed study design through simulations and analysis of a theoretically null relationship using Veterans Administration (VA) data. Simulation studies show that the case-case-time-control can adjust for exposure trends while controlling for time-invariant confounders. Use of an inappropriate control group left case-time-control analyses biased by exposure-time trends. When analyzing the relationship between vitamin exposure and stroke, using data on 3192 patients in the VA system, a case-crossover odds ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval = 1.3-1.7) was reduced to 1.1 (0.9-1.3) when divided by the concurrent exposure trend odds ratio (1.4) in matched future cases. This applied example demonstrates how our approach can adjust for exposure trends observed across time axes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Case-Case Time Control
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A. Time-Invariant Confounding B. Time-Invariant Confounding Plus Change in Exposure Prevalence
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Exposure Time Trends A. Calendar Time B. 365 Days Prior to Stroke Event

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(2):144–153. - PubMed
    1. Farrington CP. Control without separate controls: evaluation of vaccine safety using case-only methods. Vaccine. 2004;22(15-16):2064–2070. - PubMed
    1. Lumley T, Levy D. Bias in the case - crossover design: implications for studies of air pollution. Environmetrics. 2000;11(6):689–704.
    1. Suissa S. The case-time-control design. Epidemiology. 1995;6(3):248–253. - PubMed
    1. Whitaker HJ, Farrington CP, Spiessens B, Musonda P. Tutorial in biostatistics: the self-controlled case series method. Stat Med. 2006;25(10):1768–1797. - PubMed

Publication types