Reasons for not seeking eye care among adults aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe visual impairment--21 States, 2006-2009
- PMID: 21597453
Reasons for not seeking eye care among adults aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe visual impairment--21 States, 2006-2009
Abstract
In 2000, an estimated 3.4 million U.S. residents aged ≥40 years were blind or visually impaired. Vision problems place a substantial burden on individuals, caregivers, health-care payers, and the U.S. economy, with the total cost estimated at $51.4 billion annually. Although regular comprehensive eye examinations are essential for timely treatment of eye disease to maintain vision health, a previous study has shown that substantial percentages of persons do not seek eye care, despite having visual impairment. To ascertain why adults aged ≥40 years with moderate-to-severe visual impairment did not seek eye care in the preceding year, CDC analyzed data for 21 states from 2006-2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. This report summarizes the results of that analysis, which found that eye-care cost or lack of insurance (39.8%) and perception of no need (34.6%) were the most common reasons given for not seeking eye care. Among those aged 40-64 years, cost or lack of health insurance was the most common reason (42.8%); among those aged ≥65 years, the most common reason was no need (43.8%). Identifying the reasons for unmet eye-care needs might enable development of targeted interventions to improve vision health among those with moderate-to-severe visual impairment.
Similar articles
-
Visual impairment and eye care among older adults - five States, 2005.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Dec 15;55(49):1321-5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006. PMID: 17167393
-
Eye-care utilization among women aged > or =40 years with eye diseases--19 states, 2006-2008.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 May 21;59(19):588-91. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010. PMID: 20489682
-
Use of eye care services and need for assistance in the visually impaired.Optom Vis Sci. 2008 May;85(5):341-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bea29. Optom Vis Sci. 2008. PMID: 18451738
-
Building a basis for action: enhancing public health surveillance of vision impairment and eye health in the United States.Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;154(6 Suppl):S8-22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Sep 7. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22959360 Review.
-
Eye care services for older institutionalised individuals affected by cognitive and visual deficits: a systematic review.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Sep;36(5):566-83. doi: 10.1111/opo.12311. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016. PMID: 27580756 Review.
Cited by
-
Eye Care Among US Adults at High Risk for Vision Loss in the United States in 2002 and 2017.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):479-489. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0273. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32163124 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of health education and screening location on compliance with diabetic retinopathy screening in a rural population in Maharashtra.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;68(Suppl 1):S47-S51. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1976_19. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31937729 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy among a group of diabetic patients in main public hospitals in Damascus, Syria during the Syrian crisis.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4375-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31382956 Free PMC article.
-
The reduction of horizontal inequity in unmet refractive error: The Shahroud Eye Cohort Study, 2009-2014.J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 27;31(2):188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Jun. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 31317098 Free PMC article.
-
Non-adherence to eye care in people with diabetes.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Jul 31;5(1):e000333. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000333. eCollection 2017. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017. PMID: 28878930 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
