Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;26(10):1152-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1745-2. Epub 2011 May 21.

Age and receipt of guideline-recommended medications for heart failure: a nationwide study of veterans

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Age and receipt of guideline-recommended medications for heart failure: a nationwide study of veterans

Michael A Steinman et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Older patients often receive less guideline-concordant care for heart failure than younger patients.

Objective: To determine whether age differences in heart failure care are explained by patient, provider, and health system characteristics and/or by chart-documented reasons for non-adherence to guidelines.

Design and patients: Retrospective cohort study of 2,772 ambulatory veterans with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% from a 2004 nationwide medical record review program (the VA External Peer Review Program).

Main measures: Ambulatory use of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers.

Results: Among 2,772 patients, mean age was 73 +/- 10 years, 87% received an ACE inhibitor or ARB, and 82% received a beta blocker. When patients with explicit chart-documented reasons for not receiving these drugs were excluded, 95% received an ACE inhibitor or ARB and 89% received a beta blocker. In multivariable analyses controlling for a variety of patient and health system characteristics, the adjusted odds ratio for ACE-inhibitor and ARB use was 0.43 (95% CI 0.24-0.78) for patients age 80 and over vs. those age 50-64 years, and the adjusted odds ratio for beta blocker use was 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.93) between the two age groups. The magnitude of these associations was similar but not statistically significant after excluding patients with chart-documented reasons for not prescribing ACE inhibitors or ARBs and beta blockers.

Conclusions: A high proportion of veterans receive guideline-recommended medications for heart failure. Older veterans are consistently less likely to receive these drugs, although these differences were no longer significant when accounting for patients with chart-documented reasons for not prescribing these drugs. Closely evaluating reasons for non-prescribing in older adults is essential to assessing whether non-treatment represents good clinical judgment or missed opportunities to improve care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Use of guideline-recommended interventions among veterans with heart failure. “Chart-documented reasons” for non-prescribing comprise reasons specifically cited by the treating clinician for not prescribing an ACE inhibitor or ARB and/or beta blocker. * Complete data on use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs were only available for the third and fourth quarters of the study year. In addition, six patients were participating in a clinical trial of heart failure therapy and were excluded from the analysis of ACE-inhibitor or ARB use. Data on beta blocker use were missing for 46 patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fonarow GC. Quality indicators for the management of heart failure in vulnerable elders. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(8 Pt 2):694–702. - PubMed
    1. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2005;112(12):e154–235. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.167586. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. The SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(5):293–302. - PubMed
    1. Foody JM, Farrell MH, Krumholz HM. beta-Blocker therapy in heart failure: scientific review. JAMA. 2002;287(7):883–889. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.7.883. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):709–717. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances