Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 May;70(5):1273-7; discussion 1277-8.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318215bedd.

Complications and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral fractures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Complications and hardware removal after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral fractures

Scott Lovald et al. J Trauma. 2011 May.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to review internal fixation of humerus fractures using a large national database and assess the incidence of implant removal procedures based on patient characteristics.

Methods: The 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify two different sets of patients: (1) all patients who received an open internal fixation procedure for a fracture of the upper end, shaft, or lower end of the humerus; and (2) all patients with a removal of implanted devices from the humerus. Patient variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, median household income, patient geographic region, metropolitan location, and primary expected payor. The differences of characteristics between both groups were determined using χ, Fisher's exact, or unpaired t tests.

Results: Open reduction with internal fixation was reported in 7,391 patients. Hardware removals were reported in 751 patients who were determined to have an associated diagnosed complication. From these numbers, the "failure" removal rate as a percentage of the total number of procedures for the year was 10.2%. Nonunion (17.5%) and Mechanical Complication of the Implant (16.2%) were the most common complications. Both payor (p=0.0023) and age (p<0.0001) were found to have significantly different distributions among the open reduction with internal fixation and removal groups.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the age of the patient and the patient's ability to pay may influence the likelihood of an implant removal procedure. The results will help identify patients who are at high risk for revision and who may benefit from preventative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources