Mass prophylaxis dispensing concerns: traffic and public access to PODs
- PMID: 21612365
- DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0027
Mass prophylaxis dispensing concerns: traffic and public access to PODs
Abstract
The ability to quickly dispense postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) using multiple points of dispensing (PODs) following a bioterrorism event could potentially save a large proportion of those who were exposed, while failure in PEP dispensing could have dire public health consequences. A Monte Carlo simulation was developed to explore the traffic flow and parking around PODs under different arrival rates and how these factors might affect the utilization rate of POD workers. The results demonstrate that the public can reasonably access the PODs under ideal conditions assuming a stationary (uniform) arrival rate. For the 5 nonstationary arrival rates tested, however, the available parking spaces quickly become filled, causing long traffic queues and resulting in total processing times that range from 1 hour to over 6 hours. Basic planning considerations should include the use of physical barriers, signage, and traffic control officers to help direct vehicular and pedestrian access to the PODs. Furthermore, the parking and traffic surrounding PODs creates long queues of people waiting to access the PODs. Thus, POD staff are fully used approximately 90% of the time, which can lead to worker fatigue and burn out.
Similar articles
-
Uncertainty and operational considerations in mass prophylaxis workforce planning.Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S121-31. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181be9c39. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009. PMID: 19797960
-
Field testing a head-of-household method to dispense antibiotics.Biosecur Bioterror. 2007 Sep;5(3):255-67. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.0022. Biosecur Bioterror. 2007. PMID: 17903094
-
A national study examining closed points of dispensing (PODs): existence, preparedness, exercise participation, and training provided.Biosecur Bioterror. 2014 Jul-Aug;12(4):208-16. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2014.0014. Epub 2014 Jul 11. Biosecur Bioterror. 2014. PMID: 25014759
-
Infection prevention in points of dispensing.Am J Infect Control. 2009 Nov;37(9):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.001. Am J Infect Control. 2009. PMID: 19874980 Review.
-
A Survey of Location-Allocation of Points of Dispensing During Public Health Emergencies.Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;10:811858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.811858. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35359775 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Repurposing COVID-19 Drive-Through Testing Centers for Mass Vaccination.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 20;13:1665-1667. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S279618. eCollection 2020. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020. PMID: 33262601 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Operational Strategies of South Korea and Israel's Coronavirus Drive-Through Testing Centers and the Implications on Testing Capacity.Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jul 16;13:821-823. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S259347. eCollection 2020. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020. PMID: 32765136 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Screening Center: How to Balance between the Speed and Safety?J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Apr 20;35(15):e157. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e157. J Korean Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32301302 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Drive-Through Screening Center for COVID-19: a Safe and Efficient Screening System against Massive Community Outbreak.J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Mar 23;35(11):e123. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e123. J Korean Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32193904 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling Tool for Decision Support during Early Days of an Anthrax Event.Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jan;23(1):46-55. doi: 10.3201/eid2301.151787. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 27983505 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
