Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Aug;49(8):780-5.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b3604.

Effect of patient selection method on provider group performance estimates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of patient selection method on provider group performance estimates

Carolyn T Thorpe et al. Med Care. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Performance measurement at the provider group level is increasingly advocated, but different methods for selecting patients when calculating provider group performance have received little evaluation.

Objective: We compared 2 currently used methods according to characteristics of the patients selected and impact on performance estimates.

Research design, subjects, and measures: We analyzed Medicare claims data for fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes ever seen at an academic multispeciality physician group in 2003 to 2004. We examined sample size, sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and receipt of recommended diabetes monitoring in 2004 for the groups of patients selected using 2 methods implemented in large-scale performance initiatives: the Plurality Provider Algorithm and the Diabetes Care Home method. We examined differences among discordantly assigned patients to determine evidence for differential selection regarding these measures.

Results: Fewer patients were selected under the Diabetes Care Home method (n=3558) than the Plurality Provider Algorithm (n=4859). Compared with the Plurality Provider Algorithm, the Diabetes Care Home method preferentially selected patients who were female, not entitled because of disability, older, more likely to have hypertension, and less likely to have kidney disease and peripheral vascular disease, and had lower levels of predicted utilization. Diabetes performance was higher under Diabetes Care Home method, with 67% versus 58% receiving >1 A1c tests, 70% versus 65% receiving ≥1 low-density lipoprotein (LDL) test, and 38% versus 37% receiving an eye examination.

Conclusions: The method used to select patients when calculating provider group performance may affect patient case mix and estimated performance levels, and warrants careful consideration when comparing performance estimates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overlap between patient samples assigned to the provider group using the Plurality Provider Algorithm (PPA) and the Diabetes Care Home (DCH) method.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand ST, et al. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1895–1902. - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES, Staiger DO, Bynum JPW, et al. Creating accountable care organizations: The extended hospital medical staff. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:W44–W57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES, McClellan MB, Bertko J, et al. Fostering accountable health care: Moving forward in Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:W219–W231. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher ES. Paying for performance: Risks and recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1845–1847. - PubMed
    1. Kautter J, Pope GC, Trisolini M, et al. Medicare Physician Group Practice demonstration design: Quality and efficiency pay-for-performance. Health Care Financ Rev. 2007;29:15–29. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types