User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange
- PMID: 21622933
- PMCID: PMC3168324
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000281
User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange
Abstract
Objective: We assessed the usability of a health information exchange (HIE) in a densely populated metropolitan region. This grant-funded HIE had been deployed rapidly to address the imminent needs of the patient population and the need to draw wider participation from regional entities.
Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of individuals given access to the HIE at participating organizations and examined some of the usability and usage factors related to the technology acceptance model.
Measurements: We probed user perceptions using the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction, an author-generated Trust scale, and user characteristic questions (eg, age, weekly system usage time).
Results: Overall, users viewed the system favorably (ratings for all usability items were greater than neutral (one-sample Wilcoxon test, p<0.0014, Bonferroni-corrected for 35 tests). System usage was regressed on usability, trust, and demographic and user characteristic factors. Three usability factors were positively predictive of system usage: overall reactions (p<0 0.01), learning (p<0.05), and system functionality (p<0.01). Although trust is an important component in collaborative relationships, we did not find that user trust of other participating healthcare entities was significantly predictive of usage. An analysis of respondents' comments revealed ways to improve the HIE.
Conclusion: We used a rapid deployment model to develop an HIE and found that perceptions of system usability were positive. We also found that system usage was predicted well by some aspects of usability. Results from this study suggest that a rapid development approach may serve as a viable model for developing usable HIEs serving communities with limited resources.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jan;83(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18. Int J Med Inform. 2014. PMID: 24200753
-
Health information exchange system usage patterns in three communities: practice sites, users, patients, and data.Int J Med Inform. 2013 Sep;82(9):810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3. Int J Med Inform. 2013. PMID: 23743323
-
Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):392-400. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000432. Epub 2011 Oct 14. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012. PMID: 22003156 Free PMC article.
-
Optimization of infobutton design and Implementation: A systematic review.J Biomed Inform. 2017 Oct;74:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 22. J Biomed Inform. 2017. PMID: 28838801 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What should we measure? Conceptualizing usage in health information exchange.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):302-7. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000471. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010. PMID: 20442148 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Provider Prior Use of HIE on System Complexity, Performance, Patient Care, Quality and System Concerns.Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(1):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s10796-020-10064-x. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Inf Syst Front. 2022. PMID: 32982572 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital adoption of multiple health information exchange approaches and information accessibility.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):577-583. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa003. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32049356 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer perceptions of health IT utilization and benefits.JAMIA Open. 2018 Dec 24;2(1):99-106. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy049. eCollection 2019 Apr. JAMIA Open. 2018. PMID: 31984349 Free PMC article.
-
Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.5334/egems.249. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017. PMID: 29881743 Free PMC article.
-
Patient crossover and potentially avoidable repeat computed tomography exams across a health information exchange.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):30-38. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw035. Epub 2016 May 13. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017. PMID: 27178985 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lorenzi N. Strategies for Creating Successful Local Health Information Infrastructure Initiatives. Washington DC, USA: Services USDoHaH, 2003:1–27
-
- Thompson T, Brailer D. The Decade of Health Information Technology: Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-rich Health Care Framework for Strategic Action. Washington DC, USA: Department of Health and Human Services, 2004:178
-
- Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Lipton M, et al. Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:426–32 - PubMed
-
- Cheng PH, Chen HS, Lai F, et al. The strategic use of standardized information exchange technology in a university health system. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:314–26 - PubMed
