Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):711-6.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000281. Epub 2011 May 27.

User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange

Cynthia S Gadd et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: We assessed the usability of a health information exchange (HIE) in a densely populated metropolitan region. This grant-funded HIE had been deployed rapidly to address the imminent needs of the patient population and the need to draw wider participation from regional entities.

Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of individuals given access to the HIE at participating organizations and examined some of the usability and usage factors related to the technology acceptance model.

Measurements: We probed user perceptions using the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction, an author-generated Trust scale, and user characteristic questions (eg, age, weekly system usage time).

Results: Overall, users viewed the system favorably (ratings for all usability items were greater than neutral (one-sample Wilcoxon test, p<0.0014, Bonferroni-corrected for 35 tests). System usage was regressed on usability, trust, and demographic and user characteristic factors. Three usability factors were positively predictive of system usage: overall reactions (p<0 0.01), learning (p<0.05), and system functionality (p<0.01). Although trust is an important component in collaborative relationships, we did not find that user trust of other participating healthcare entities was significantly predictive of usage. An analysis of respondents' comments revealed ways to improve the HIE.

Conclusion: We used a rapid deployment model to develop an HIE and found that perceptions of system usability were positive. We also found that system usage was predicted well by some aspects of usability. Results from this study suggest that a rapid development approach may serve as a viable model for developing usable HIEs serving communities with limited resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Technology acceptance model (TAM) adapted to illustrate the relationship between system usage and usability (using QUIS variables), usefulness, trust, and socio-demographic variables. Shaded boxes indicate our variables of interest.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshots of the health information exchange interface for a test patient: Clinical History (top) and Encounters (bottom).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lorenzi N. Strategies for Creating Successful Local Health Information Infrastructure Initiatives. Washington DC, USA: Services USDoHaH, 2003:1–27
    1. Thompson T, Brailer D. The Decade of Health Information Technology: Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-rich Health Care Framework for Strategic Action. Washington DC, USA: Department of Health and Human Services, 2004:178
    1. Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Lipton M, et al. Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:426–32 - PubMed
    1. Finnell JT, Overhage JM, Dexter PR, et al. Community clinical data exchange for emergency medicine patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:235–8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng PH, Chen HS, Lai F, et al. The strategic use of standardized information exchange technology in a university health system. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:314–26 - PubMed

Publication types