Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;59(6):1052-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03446.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

Pressure-redistributing support surface use and pressure ulcer incidence in elderly hip fracture patients

Affiliations

Pressure-redistributing support surface use and pressure ulcer incidence in elderly hip fracture patients

Shayna E Rich et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the association between pressure-redistributing support surface (PRSS) use and incident pressure ulcers in older adults with hip fracture.

Design: Secondary analysis of data from prospective cohort with assessments performed as soon as possible after hospital admission and on alternating days for 21 days.

Setting: Nine hospitals in the Baltimore Hip Studies network and 105 postacute facilities to which participants were discharged.

Participants: Six hundred fifty-eight people aged 65 and older who underwent surgery for hip fracture.

Measurements: Full-body examination for pressure ulcers; bedbound status; and PRSS use, recorded as none, powered (alternating pressure mattresses, low-air-loss mattresses, and alternating pressure overlays), or nonpowered (high-density foam, static air, or gel-filled mattresses or pressure-redistributing overlays except for alternating pressure overlays).

Results: Incident pressure ulcers (IPUs), Stage 2 or higher, were observed at 4.2% (195/4,638) of visits after no PRSS use, 4.5% (28/623) of visits after powered PRSS use, and 3.6% (54/1,496) of visits after nonpowered PRSS use. The rate of IPU per person-day of follow-up did not differ significantly between participants using powered PRSSs and those not using PRSSs. The rate also did not differ significantly between participants using nonpowered PRSSs and those not using PRSSs, except in the subset of bedbound participants (incidence rate ratio=0.3, 95% confidence interval=0.1-0.7).

Conclusion: PRSS use was not associated with a lower IPU rate. Clinical guidelines may need revision for the limited effect of PRSS use, and it may be appropriate to target PRSS use to bedbound patients at risk of pressure ulcers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The first author’s work on this study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (T32 AG000262 and F30 AG034008). The parent study was supported by grants from National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (5R01 AR 47711); University of Maryland General Clinical Research Center Grant, General Clinical Research Centers Program, National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR 16500); and National Institute on Aging Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30 AG028747).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of study visits with an incident pressure ulcer Stage 2 or higher (IPU) at the following visit, according to type of support surface in use at a given visit. P = .47 for the association between type of support surface in use at a given visit and IPU at the following visit as derived from chi-square, indicating 10 significant difference. PRSS = pressure-redistributing support surface; n = number of person-visits at which each type of support surface was used.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Revisions to appendix P (survey protocols for long term care facilities) and appendix PP (guidance to surveyors for long term care facilities) Department of Health and Human Services; 2004. Nov 19, Report No. 100-07 State Operations Provider Certification, Transmittal 5.
    1. Barczak CA, Barnett RI, Childs EJ, et al. Fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Wound Care. 1997;10:18–26. - PubMed
    1. Whittington KT, Briones R. National prevalence and incidence study: 6-year sequential acute care data. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004;17:490–494. - PubMed
    1. Beckrich K, Aronovitch SA. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: A comparison of costs in medical vs. surgical patients. Nurs Econ. 1999;17:263–271. - PubMed
    1. Zhan C, Miller MR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003;290:1868–1874. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms