Spinal manipulations for cervicogenic headaches: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Headache. Jul-Aug 2011;51(7):1132-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01932.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of spinal manipulations as a treatment option for cervicogenic headaches. Seven databases were searched from their inception to February 2011. All randomized trials which investigated spinal manipulations performed by any type of healthcare professional for treating cervicogenic headaches in human subjects were considered. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validation were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Nine randomized clinical trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Their methodological quality was mostly poor. Six RCTs suggested that spinal manipulation is more effective than physical therapy, gentle massage, drug therapy, or no intervention. Three RCTs showed no differences in pain, duration, and frequency of headaches compared to placebo, manipulation, physical therapy, massage, or wait list controls. Adequate control for placebo effect was achieved in 1 RCT only, and this trial showed no benefit of spinal manipulations beyond a placebo effect. The majority of RCTs failed to provide details of adverse effects. There are few rigorous RCTs testing the effectiveness of spinal manipulations for treating cervicogenic headaches. The results are mixed and the only trial accounting for placebo effects fails to be positive. Therefore, the therapeutic value of this approach remains uncertain.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Databases, Factual / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Manipulation, Spinal / methods*
  • Post-Traumatic Headache / rehabilitation*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
  • Treatment Outcome