Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul 1;53(1):20-5.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cir246.

The impact of ICD-9-CM code rank order on the estimated prevalence of Clostridium difficile infections

Affiliations

The impact of ICD-9-CM code rank order on the estimated prevalence of Clostridium difficile infections

Erik R Dubberke et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: US estimates of the Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) burden have utilized International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. Whether ICD-9-CM code rank order affects CDI prevalence estimates is important because the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) have varying limits on the number of ICD-9-CM codes collected.

Methods: ICD-9-CM codes for CDI (008.45), C. difficile toxin assay results, and dates of admission and discharge were collected from electronic hospital databases for adult patients admitted to 4 hospitals in the United States from July 2000 through June 2006. CDI prevalence per 1000 discharges was calculated and compared for NHDS and NIS limits and toxin assay results from the same hospitals. CDI prevalence estimates were compared using the χ(2) test, and the test of equality was used to compare slopes.

Results: CDI prevalence measured by NIS criteria was significantly higher than that measured using NHDS criteria (10.7 cases per 1000 discharges versus 9.4 cases per 1000 discharges; P<.001) in the 4 hospitals. CDI prevalence measured by toxin assay results was 9.4 cases per 1000 discharges (P=.57 versus NHDS). However, the CDI prevalence increased more rapidly over time when measured according to the NHDS criteria than when measured according to toxin assay results (β=1.09 versus 0.84; P=.008).

Conclusions: Compared with the NHDS definition, the NIS definition captured 12% more CDI cases and reported significantly higher CDI rates. Rates calculated using toxin assay results were not different from rates calculated using NHDS criteria, but CDI prevalence appeared to increase more rapidly when measured by NHDS criteria than when measured by toxin assay results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportion of patients who were assigned the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code for Clostridium difficile infection identified by National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) and Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) limits.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Yearly overall Clostridium difficile infection rates by surveillance definition. ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; NHDS, National Hospital Discharge Survey; NIS, Nationwide Inpatient Sample.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Yearly hospital Clostridium difficile infection rates by surveillance definition at hospitals A, B, C, and D. ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; NHDS, National Hospital Discharge Survey; NIS, Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dallal RM, Harbrecht BG, Boujoukas AJ, et al. Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications. Ann Surg. 2002;235:363–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muto CA, Pokrywka M, Shutt K, et al. A large outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with an unexpected proportion of deaths and colectomies at a teaching hospital following increased fluoroquinolone use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26:273–80. - PubMed
    1. Pepin J, Valiquette L, Alary ME, et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ. 2004;171:466–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pepin J, Saheb N, Coulombe MA, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolones as the predominant risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a cohort study during an epidemic in Quebec. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1254–60. - PubMed
    1. McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, et al. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433–1. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances