The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US
- PMID: 21658255
- PMCID: PMC3141363
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-13
The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US
Abstract
Background: Adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue, often a result of surgery, that form between internal organs and tissues, joining them together abnormally. Postoperative adhesions frequently occur following abdominal surgery, and are associated with a large economic burden. This study examines the inpatient burden of adhesiolysis in the United States (i.e., number and rate of events, cost, length of stay [LOS]).
Methods: Hospital discharge data for patients with primary and secondary adhesiolysis were analyzed using the 2005 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Procedures were aggregated by body system.
Results: We identified 351,777 adhesiolysis-related hospitalizations: 23.2% for primary and 76.8% for secondary adhesiolysis. The average LOS was 7.8 days for primary adhesiolysis. We found that 967,332 days of care were attributed to adhesiolysis-related procedures, with inpatient expenditures totaling $2.3 billion ($1.4 billion for primary adhesiolysis; $926 million for secondary adhesiolysis). Hospitalizations for adhesiolysis increased steadily by age and were higher for women. Of secondary adhesiolysis procedures, 46.3% involved the female reproductive tract, resulting in 57,005 additional days of care and $220 million in attributable costs.
Conclusions: Adhesiolysis remain an important surgical problem in the United States. Hospitalization for this condition leads to high direct surgical costs, which should be of interest to providers and payers.
Similar articles
-
Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994.J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Jan;186(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00127-0. J Am Coll Surg. 1998. PMID: 9449594
-
Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Mar;176(3):271-6. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993. PMID: 8438200
-
Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery.Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):98-106. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 23013804
-
The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):5-9. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9076446 Review.
-
Videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Personal experience and literature review.Clin Ter. 2017 Nov-Dec;168(6):e357-e360. doi: 10.7417/T.2017.2034. Clin Ter. 2017. PMID: 29209684 Review.
Cited by
-
Sprayable anti-adhesive hydrogel for peritoneal macrophage scavenging in post-surgical applications.Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 27;15(1):8364. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52753-0. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 39333108 Free PMC article.
-
A Scoping Review of Animal Models for Development of Abdominal Adhesion Prevention Strategies.J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:364-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.049. Epub 2024 Aug 16. J Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39153357 Review.
-
Preventive Effects of Bioabsorbable Anti-Adhesion Barriers on Bowel Obstruction After Colectomy in Colon Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using an Insurance Claims Database.Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Sep;58(5):831-837. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00660-3. Epub 2024 May 6. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024. PMID: 38710990
-
NETworking for Health and in Disease: Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Pediatric Surgical Care.Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 1;11(3):295. doi: 10.3390/children11030295. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38539330 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perspectives in adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery.Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Dec;15(4):291-296. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.4.108. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023. PMID: 38128088 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beck DE. Understanding abdominal adhesions. Ostomy Q. 2001;38(2):50–51.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
