Phased implementation of electronic health records through an office of clinical transformation
- PMID: 21659444
- PMCID: PMC3168317
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000165
Phased implementation of electronic health records through an office of clinical transformation
Abstract
Evidence suggests that when carefully implemented, health information technologies (HIT) have a positive impact on behavior, as well as operational, process, and clinical outcomes. Recent economic stimulus initiatives have prompted unprecedented federal investment in HIT. Despite strong interest from the healthcare delivery community to achieve 'meaningful use' of HIT within a relatively short time frame, few best-practice implementation methodologies have been described. Herein we outline HIT implementation strategies at an academic health center with an office of clinical transformation. Seven percent of the medical center's information technology budget was dedicated to the Office of Clinical Transformation, and successful conversion of 1491 physicians to electronic-based documentation was accomplished. This paper outlines the process re-design, end-user adoption, and practice transformation strategies that resulted in a 99.7% adoption rate within 6 months of the introduction of digital documentation.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):302-313. doi: 10.1071/AH17153. Aust Health Rev. 2019. PMID: 29792259
-
Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior.Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00003. Acad Med. 1993. PMID: 8447887
-
Top 10 Lessons Learned from Electronic Medical Record Implementation in a Large Academic Medical Center.Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Jul 1;12(Summer):1g. eCollection 2015. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015. PMID: 26396558 Free PMC article.
-
A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Oct 15;10:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-60. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010. PMID: 20950458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):779-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Int J Med Inform. 2014. PMID: 25085286 Review.
Cited by
-
Bridging informatics and implementation science: evaluating a framework to assess electronic health record implementations in community settings.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:770-8. Epub 2012 Nov 3. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012. PMID: 23304351 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e36-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000968. Epub 2012 Apr 20. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012. PMID: 22523344 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1103–17 - PubMed
-
- Orszag PR. Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Testimony before Congress. 24 July 2008
-
- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and Institute of Medicine Crossing the Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001 - PubMed
-
- Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1409–16 - PubMed
-
- Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, et al. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:108–14 - PubMed
