Has the use of anti-adhesion barriers affected the national rate of bowel obstruction?
- PMID: 21679649
Has the use of anti-adhesion barriers affected the national rate of bowel obstruction?
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed temporal trends in anti-adhesion barrier application and admission rates for small bowel obstruction. We used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and identified patients with ICD-9 codes for "application or administration of anti-adhesion barrier substances" from October 2002 through December 2007. Next, we identified cases of bowel obstruction coded from January 1997 through December 2007. We then used Kendall correlation analyses and the Joinpoint regression program to evaluate changes in trends. From October 1, 2002 through December 31, 2007, a total of 28,014 patients had an anti-adhesion barrier substance applied. During the study period, application of anti-adhesion barriers increased from 0.7 applications per 100,000 to 2.6 applications per 100,000 population (Joinpoint and Kendall; P < 0.002). Since 1997 there has been a steady rise in hospitalizations for bowel obstruction, increasing from 18.3 cases per 100,000 to 19.8 cases per 100,000 population (Joinpoint and Kendall; P < 0.002). In conclusion, the application of anti-adhesion barriers has increased significantly since 2002, yet bowel obstructions continue to be a major health problem.
Similar articles
-
Adhesion-related bowel obstruction after hysterectomy for benign conditions.Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1162-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239098.33320.c4. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 17077238
-
The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction.Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):5-9. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997. PMID: 9076446 Review.
-
Adhesions: prevention and complications in general surgery.Eur J Surg. 1997 Mar;163(3):169-74. Eur J Surg. 1997. PMID: 9085057
-
National and regional rates and variation of cervical discectomy with and without anterior fusion, 1990-1999.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 1;28(9):931-9; discussion 940. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000058880.89444.A9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 12942010
-
Control and prevention of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery.Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5 Suppl 1):S1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1483. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 17055798 Review.
Cited by
-
Absorptive anti-adhesion barrier for the prevention of bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018 Mar 9;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2017-026. eCollection 2018. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018. PMID: 31583316 Free PMC article.
-
Managing Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction with Water-Soluble Contrast Should Be Protocolized: A Retrospective Analysis.Surg J (N Y). 2018 Jul 20;4(3):e123-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666781. eCollection 2018 Jul. Surg J (N Y). 2018. PMID: 30038961 Free PMC article.
-
A novel adenosine precursor 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate inhibits formation of post-surgical adhesions.Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Sep;59(9):2118-25. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3139-x. Epub 2014 Apr 8. Dig Dis Sci. 2014. PMID: 24711075 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical