Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program
- PMID: 21684114
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.011
Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program
Abstract
Objectives: To review the current knowledge and efforts on updating systematic reviews (SRs) as applied to comparative effectiveness reviews (CERs).
Study design and setting: This article outlines considerations for updating CERs by including a definition of the updating process, describing issues around assessing whether to update, and providing general guidelines for the update process. Key points to consider include (1) identifying when to update CERs, (2) how to update CERs, and (3) how to present, report, and interpret updated results in CERs.
Results: Currently, there is little information about what proportion of SRs needs updating. Similarly, there is no consensus on when to initiate updating and how best to carry it out.
Conclusion: CERs need to be regularly updated as new evidence is produced. Lack of attention to updating may lead to outdated and sometimes misleading conclusions that compromise health care and policy decisions. The article outlines several specific goals for future research, one of them being the development of efficient guideline for updating CERs applicable across evidence-based practice centers.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Engraving marble and comparative effectiveness reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1468-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.007. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 22032758 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010. Epub 2011 Apr 7. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21477993
-
Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.021. Epub 2011 Apr 3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21463926
-
Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21684115 Review.
-
Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027. Epub 2011 Jun 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21636246
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18354710 Review.
Cited by
-
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews1.J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2023;16(2):241-273. doi: 10.3233/PRM-230019. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2023. PMID: 37302044 Free PMC article.
-
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 8;12(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37291658 Free PMC article.
-
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews.BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08304-x. BMC Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37286949 Free PMC article.
-
Lag times in the publication of network meta-analyses: a survey.BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e048581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048581. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34489278 Free PMC article.
-
Opioid-Free Anesthesia Benefit-Risk Balance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Med. 2021 May 12;10(10):2069. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102069. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34065937 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
