Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?
- PMID: 21690592
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00005
Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?
Abstract
Background: The optimal setting and number of blood pressure (BP) measurements that should be used for clinical decision making and quality reporting are uncertain.
Objective: To compare strategies for home or clinic BP measurement and their effect on classifying patients as having BP that was in or out of control.
Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial of strategies to improve hypertension management. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00237692)
Setting: Primary care clinics affiliated with the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Patients: 444 veterans with hypertension followed for 18 months.
Measurements: Blood pressure was measured repeatedly by using 3 methods: standardized research BP measurements at 6-month intervals; clinic BP measurements obtained during outpatient visits; and home BP measurements using a monitor that transmitted measurements electronically.
Results: Patients provided 111,181 systolic BP (SBP) measurements (3218 research, 7121 clinic, and 100,842 home measurements) over 18 months. Systolic BP control rates at baseline (mean SBP<140 mm Hg for clinic or research measurement; <135 mm Hg for home measurement) varied substantially, with 28% classified as in control by clinic measurement, 47% by home measurement, and 68% by research measurement. Short-term variability was large and similar across all 3 methods of measurement, with a mean within-patient coefficient of variation of 10% (range, 1% to 24%). Patients could not be classified as having BP that was in or out of control with 80% certainty on the basis of a single clinic SBP measurement from 120 mm Hg to 157 mm Hg. The effect of within-patient variability could be greatly reduced by averaging several measurements, with most benefit accrued at 5 to 6 measurements.
Limitation: The sample was mostly men with a long-standing history of hypertension and was selected on the basis of previous poor BP control.
Conclusion: Physicians who want to have 80% or more certainty that they are correctly classifying patients' BP control should use the average of several measurements. Hypertension quality metrics based on a single clinic measurement potentially misclassify a large proportion of patients.
Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.
Comment in
-
Summaries for patients. Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 21;154(12):I23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00001. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21690576 No abstract available.
-
Improving the measurement of blood pressure: is it time for regulated standards?Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 21;154(12):838-40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00014. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21690599 No abstract available.
-
Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):565; author reply 565-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00025. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22007055 No abstract available.
-
Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):565; author reply 565-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00026. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22007056 No abstract available.
-
Averaging clinic and home measures associated with reductions in within-patient variability and may give a better indication of blood pressure control.Evid Based Med. 2012 Jun;17(3):82-3. doi: 10.1136/ebm.2011.100162. Epub 2011 Oct 25. Evid Based Med. 2012. PMID: 22028375 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15531006 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617. JAMA Netw Open. 2018. PMID: 30646139 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A multimodal blood pressure control intervention in 3 healthcare systems.Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e96-103. Am J Manag Care. 2011. PMID: 21774100 Clinical Trial.
-
Home blood pressure monitoring in CKD.Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):835-42. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014. PMID: 24529535 Review.
-
Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement.Occup Environ Med. 2000 Aug;57(8):510-20. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.8.510. Occup Environ Med. 2000. PMID: 10896957 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Blood Pressure Control among Adults with Hypertension at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Jul;33(4):563-570. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i4.2. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023. PMID: 38784211 Free PMC article.
-
Blood pressure variability supersedes heart rate variability as a real-world measure of dementia risk.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):1838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52406-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38246978 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Measured Blood Pressure-Guided Pharmacotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of United States-Based Telemedicine Trials.Hypertension. 2024 Mar;81(3):648-657. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22109. Epub 2024 Jan 8. Hypertension. 2024. PMID: 38189139
-
Leveraging Electronic Health Record Technology and Team Care to Address Medication Adherence: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 7;12:e47930. doi: 10.2196/47930. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 37418304 Free PMC article.
-
Practice facilitation for scale up of clinical decision support for hypertension management: study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial.Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;129:107177. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107177. Epub 2023 Apr 8. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023. PMID: 37037392 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical