Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jun 21;154(12):781-8, W-289-90.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00005.

Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures?

Benjamin J Powers et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: The optimal setting and number of blood pressure (BP) measurements that should be used for clinical decision making and quality reporting are uncertain.

Objective: To compare strategies for home or clinic BP measurement and their effect on classifying patients as having BP that was in or out of control.

Design: Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial of strategies to improve hypertension management. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00237692)

Setting: Primary care clinics affiliated with the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Patients: 444 veterans with hypertension followed for 18 months.

Measurements: Blood pressure was measured repeatedly by using 3 methods: standardized research BP measurements at 6-month intervals; clinic BP measurements obtained during outpatient visits; and home BP measurements using a monitor that transmitted measurements electronically.

Results: Patients provided 111,181 systolic BP (SBP) measurements (3218 research, 7121 clinic, and 100,842 home measurements) over 18 months. Systolic BP control rates at baseline (mean SBP<140 mm Hg for clinic or research measurement; <135 mm Hg for home measurement) varied substantially, with 28% classified as in control by clinic measurement, 47% by home measurement, and 68% by research measurement. Short-term variability was large and similar across all 3 methods of measurement, with a mean within-patient coefficient of variation of 10% (range, 1% to 24%). Patients could not be classified as having BP that was in or out of control with 80% certainty on the basis of a single clinic SBP measurement from 120 mm Hg to 157 mm Hg. The effect of within-patient variability could be greatly reduced by averaging several measurements, with most benefit accrued at 5 to 6 measurements.

Limitation: The sample was mostly men with a long-standing history of hypertension and was selected on the basis of previous poor BP control.

Conclusion: Physicians who want to have 80% or more certainty that they are correctly classifying patients' BP control should use the average of several measurements. Hypertension quality metrics based on a single clinic measurement potentially misclassify a large proportion of patients.

Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data