Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective
- PMID: 21697257
- DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxr003
Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective
Abstract
Screening for breast cancer has been evaluated by 9 randomized trials over 5 decades and recommended by major guideline groups for more than 3 decades. Successes and lessons for cancer screening from this history include development of scientific methods to evaluate screening, by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; the importance of randomized trials in the past, and the increasing need to develop new methods to evaluate cancer screening in the future; the challenge of assessing new technologies that are replacing originally evaluated screening tests; the need to measure false-positive screening test results and the difficulty in reducing their frequency; the unexpected emergence of overdiagnosis due to cancer screening; the difficulty in stratifying individuals according to breast cancer risk; women's fear of breast cancer and the public outrage over changing guidelines for breast cancer screening; the need for population scientists to better communicate with the public if evidence-based recommendations are to be heeded by clinicians, patients, and insurers; new developments in the primary prevention of cancers; and the interaction between improved treatment and screening, which, over time, and together with primary prevention, may decrease the need for cancer screening.
Similar articles
-
Omissions of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):305; author reply 305-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10102097. Radiology. 2011. PMID: 21436102 No abstract available.
-
The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening.Radiol Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;48(5):843-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2010.06.005. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20868889 Review.
-
The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines ignore important scientific evidence and should be revised or withdrawn.Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):15-20. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100057. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20574081 No abstract available.
-
Breast cancer screening: from science to recommendation.Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):8-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100559. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20574080 No abstract available.
-
Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer?CMAJ. 2001 Jun 26;164(13):1837-46. CMAJ. 2001. PMID: 11450279 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Label-free multimodal electro-thermo-mechanical (ETM) phenotyping as a novel biomarker to differentiate between normal, benign, and cancerous breast biopsy tissues.J Biol Eng. 2023 Nov 13;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13036-023-00388-y. J Biol Eng. 2023. PMID: 37957665 Free PMC article.
-
Breast Cancer Genomics: Primary and Most Common Metastases.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 21;14(13):3046. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133046. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35804819 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Change in effectiveness of mammography screening with decreasing breast cancer mortality: a population-based study.Eur J Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):630-635. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac047. Eur J Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35732293 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of quality of life in early breast cancer upon completion of adjuvant chemotherapy.NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Jul 13;7(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00296-8. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34257315 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Knowledge Sharing in Cancer Screening Among High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: Insights From the International Cancer Screening Network.J Glob Oncol. 2019 Sep;5:1-8. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00202. J Glob Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31584835 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
