Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 20 (6), 1205-8

Endoscopic Versus Open Bursectomy of Lateral Malleolar Bursitis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Endoscopic Versus Open Bursectomy of Lateral Malleolar Bursitis

Jae Hyuck Choi et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.

Abstract

Purpose: Compare the result of endoscopic versus open bursectomy in lateral malleolar bursitis.

Materials and methods: Prospective evaluation of 21 patients (22 ankles) undergoing either open or endoscopic excision of lateral malleolar bursitis. The median age was 64 (38-79) years old. The median postoperative follow-up was 15 (12-18) months.

Results: Those patients undergoing endoscopic excision showed a higher satisfaction rate (excellent 9, good 2) than open excision (excellent 4, good 3, fair 1). The wounds also healed earlier in the endoscopic group although the operation time was slightly longer. One patient in the endoscopic group had recurrence of symptoms but complications in the open group included one patient with skin necrosis, one patient with wound dehiscence, and two patients of with superficial peroneal nerve injury.

Conclusions: Endoscopic resection of the lateral malleolar bursitis is a promising technique and shows favorable results compared to the open resection.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic studies-Investigating the result of treatment, Level II.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Aug;19(8):1355-61 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2007 Aug;23(8):889-902 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2000 Apr;16(3):249-53 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Aug;39(8):379-81 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jan-Feb;28(1):109-11 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback