Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Aug;96(2):360-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.087. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

Incidence of Endometriosis by Study Population and Diagnostic Method: The ENDO Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Incidence of Endometriosis by Study Population and Diagnostic Method: The ENDO Study

Germaine M Buck Louis et al. Fertil Steril. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence of endometriosis in an operative cohort of women seeking clinical care and in a matched population cohort to delineate more fully the scope and magnitude of endometriosis in the context of and beyond clinical care.

Design: Matched-exposure cohort design.

Setting: Surgical centers in the Salt Lake City, Utah, and San Francisco, California, areas.

Patient(s): The operative cohort comprised 495 women undergoing laparoscopy/laparotomy between 2007 and 2009, and the population cohort comprised 131 women from the surgical centers' catchment areas.

Intervention(s): None.

Main outcome measure(s): Incidence of endometriosis by diagnostic method in the operative cohort and by pelvic magnetic resonance imaged (MRI) disease in the population cohort.

Result(s): Endometriosis incidence in the operative cohort ranged by two orders of magnitude by diagnostic method: 0.7% for only histology, 7% for only MRI, and 41% for visualized disease. Endometriosis staging was skewed toward minimal (58%) and mild disease (15%). The incidence of MRI-diagnosed endometriosis was 11% in the population cohort.

Conclusion(s): Endometriosis incidence is dependent on the diagnostic method and choice of sampling framework. Conservatively, 11% of women have undiagnosed endometriosis at the population level, with implications for the design and interpretation of etiologic research.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 69 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback