Commercial off-the-shelf consumer health informatics interventions: recommendations for their design, evaluation and redesign
- PMID: 21727206
- PMCID: PMC3240761
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000338
Commercial off-the-shelf consumer health informatics interventions: recommendations for their design, evaluation and redesign
Abstract
Objective: The goal of this paper is to describe the successful application of a use case-based evaluation approach to guide the effective design, evaluation and redesign of inexpensive, commercial, off-the-shelf consumer health informatics (CHI) interventions.
Design: Researchers developed four CHI intervention use cases representing two distinct patient populations (patients with diabetes with high blood pressure, post-bariatric surgery patients), two commercial off-the-shelf CHI applications (Microsoft HealthVault, Google Health), and related devices (blood pressure monitor, pedometer, weight scale). Three patient proxies tested each intervention for 10 days.
Measurements: The patient proxies recorded their challenges while completing use case tasks, rating the severity of each challenge based on how much it hindered their use of the intervention. Two independent evaluators categorized the challenges by human factors domain (physical, cognitive, macroergonomic).
Results: The use case-based approach resulted in the identification of 122 challenges, with 12% physical, 50% cognitive and 38% macroergonomic. Thirty-nine challenges (32%) were at least moderately severe. Nine of 22 use case tasks (41%) accounted for 72% of the challenges.
Limitations: The study used two patient proxies and addressed two specific patient populations and low-cost, off-the-shelf CHI interventions, which may not perfectly generalize to a larger number of proxies, actual patient populations, or other CHI interventions.
Conclusion: CHI designers can employ the use case-based evaluation approach to assess the fit of a CHI intervention with patients' health work, in the context of their daily activities and environment, which would be difficult or impossible to evaluate by laboratory-based studies.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Scenario-based user testing to guide consumer health informatics design.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:719-23. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009. PMID: 20351947 Free PMC article.
-
Overcoming challenges integrating patient-generated data into the clinical EHR: lessons from the CONtrolling Disease Using Inexpensive IT--Hypertension in Diabetes (CONDUIT-HID) Project.Int J Med Inform. 2013 Oct;82(10):903-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Jun 22. Int J Med Inform. 2013. PMID: 23800678
-
Transforming consumer health informatics through a patient work framework: connecting patients to context.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):2-10. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002826. Epub 2014 Aug 14. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015. PMID: 25125685 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer Health Informatics: Past, Present, and Future of a Rapidly Evolving Domain.Yearb Med Inform. 2016 May 20;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S42-7. doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s005. Yearb Med Inform. 2016. PMID: 27199196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of consumer health informatics applications.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Oct;(188):1-546. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009. PMID: 20629477 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Going Remote-Demonstration and Evaluation of Remote Technology Delivery and Usability Assessment With Older Adults: Survey Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e26702. doi: 10.2196/26702. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 33606655 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations.Hum Factors. 2020 Nov;62(7):1041-1060. doi: 10.1177/0018720820953644. Epub 2020 Sep 22. Hum Factors. 2020. PMID: 32960093 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Human factors analysis, design, and evaluation of Engage, a consumer health IT application for geriatric heart failure self-care.Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2017;33(4):298-312. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2016.1265784. Epub 2016 Dec 29. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2017. PMID: 30429638 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of Patient Interest in Provider-Based Consumer Health Information Technology: Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 19;20(4):e128. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7766. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29674312 Free PMC article.
-
Know thy eHealth user: Development of biopsychosocial personas from a study of older adults with heart failure.Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 9. Int J Med Inform. 2017. PMID: 29132622 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zayas-Cabán T, Marquard JL. A holistic human factors evaluation framework for the design of consumer health informatics interventions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 2009 Oct 19–23. San Antonio, TX, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2009:1003–7
-
- Zayas-Cabán T, Brennan PF. Human factors in home care. In: Carayon P, ed. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007:883–97
-
- Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systematic intervention. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000126 http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126 (accessed 10 Sep 2010). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e22 http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e22/ (accessed 10 Sep 2010). - PMC - PubMed
