Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Nov;26(11):1317-23.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1773-y. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Effectiveness of intensive physician training in upfront agenda setting

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of intensive physician training in upfront agenda setting

Douglas M Brock et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Patients want all their concerns heard, but physicians fear losing control of time and interrupt patients before all concerns are raised.

Objective: We hypothesized that when physicians were trained to use collaborative upfront agenda setting, visits would be no longer, more concerns would be identified, fewer concerns would surface late in the visit, and patients would report greater satisfaction and improved functional status.

Design and participants: Post-only randomized controlled trial using qualitative and quantitative methods. Six months after training (March 2004-March 2005) physician-patient encounters in two large primary care organizations were audio taped and patients (1460) and physicians (48) were surveyed.

Intervention: Experimental physicians received training in upfront agenda setting through the Establishing Focus Protocol, including two hours of training and two hours of coaching per week for four consecutive weeks.

Main measures: Outcomes included agenda setting behaviors demonstrated during the early, middle, and late encounter phases, visit length, number of raised concerns, patient and physician satisfaction, trust and functional status.

Key results: Experimental physicians were more likely to make additional elicitations (p < 0.01) and their patients were more likely to indicate agenda completion in the early phase of the encounter (p < 0.01). Experimental group patients and physicians raised fewer concerns in the late encounter phase (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in visit length, total concerns addressed, patient or provider satisfaction, or patient trust and functional status

Conclusion: Collaborative upfront agenda setting did not increase visit length or the number of problems addressed per visit but may reduce the likelihood of "oh by the way" concerns surfacing late in the encounter. However, upfront agenda setting is not sufficient to enhance patient satisfaction, trust or functional status. Training focused on physicians instead of teams and without regular reinforcement may have limited impact in changing visit content and time use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Profile of randomized establishing focus upfront agenda setting intervention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flocke SA, Frank SH, Wenger DA. Addressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(3):211–216. - PubMed
    1. Ostbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):209–214. doi: 10.1370/afm.310. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yarnall KS, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Family physicians as team leaders: "time" to share the care. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6(2):A59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):441–450. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.05239.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mechanic D. How should hamsters run? Some observations about sufficient patient time in primary care. BMJ. 2001;323(7307):266–268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.266. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms