Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;6(6):e21098.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021098. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Dissemination of Drinking Water Contamination Data to Consumers: A Systematic Review of Impact on Consumer Behaviors

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Dissemination of Drinking Water Contamination Data to Consumers: A Systematic Review of Impact on Consumer Behaviors

Patricia J Lucas et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Drinking water contaminated by chemicals or pathogens is a major public health threat in the developing world. Responses to this threat often require water consumers (households or communities) to improve their own management or treatment of water. One approach hypothesized to increase such positive behaviors is increasing knowledge of the risks of unsafe water through the dissemination of water contamination data. This paper reviews the evidence for this approach in changing behavior and subsequent health outcomes.

Methods/principal findings: A systematic review was conducted for studies where results of tests for contaminants in drinking water were disseminated to populations whose water supply posed a known health risk. Studies of any design were included where data were available from a contemporaneous comparison or control group. Using multiple sources >14,000 documents were located. Six studies met inclusion criteria (four of arsenic contamination and two of microbiological contamination). Meta-analysis was not possible in most cases due to heterogeneity of outcomes and study designs. Outcomes included water quality, change of water source, treatment of water, knowledge of contamination, and urinary arsenic. Source switching was most frequently reported: of 5 reporting studies 4 report significantly higher rates of switching (26-72%) among those who received a positive test result and a pooled risk difference was calculate for 2 studies (RD = 0.43 [CI0.4.0-0.46] 6-12 months post intervention) suggesting 43% more of those with unsafe wells switched source compared to those with safe wells. Strength of evidence is low since the comparison is between non-equivalent groups. Two studies concerning fecal contamination reported non-significant increases in point-of-use water treatment.

Conclusion: Despite the publication of some large cohort studies and some encouraging results the evidence base to support dissemination of contamination data to improve water management is currently equivocal. Rigorous studies on this topic are needed, ideally using common outcome measures.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of included/excluded studies.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 8 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. WHO. Right to Water 2010.
    1. WHO. The Global Burden of Disease 2004 Update. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
    1. WHO & UNICEF. Water for life : making it happen. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
    1. Boschi-Pinto C, Velebit L, Shibuyac K. Estimating child mortality due to diarrhoea in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86:710–717. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson T, Fawell J, Kunikane S, Jackson D, Appleyard S, et al. Chemical safety of drinking water : assessing priorities for risk management. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
Feedback