[Clinical trials with medical devices: lack of quality illustrated for faecal incontinence]

Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Aug;137(4):380-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1271549. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
[Article in German]


Background: Medical devices must be safe and functioning states the law. Treatments with medical devices need not be efficacious to be allowed. We investigated special requirements and problems arising from the law.

Methods: The market for medical devices is contrasted with that for drugs. The requirements of relevant laws are discussed. Finally, published clinical studies on anal incontinence are analysed with respect to their methodological quality.

Results: Clinical trials of medical devices for treat-ing anal incontinence are of poor methodological quality thus preventing evaluation of the devices' utility.

Conclusion: Large, high quality clinical studies of the efficacy of medical devices for treating anal incontinence are urgently needed. Only such studies enable health technology assessment and comprehensible decisions on reimbursement by health insurance.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biofeedback, Psychology / instrumentation
  • Data Collection / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Device Approval / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy / instrumentation
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Failure
  • Equipment Safety
  • Evidence-Based Medicine / standards
  • Fecal Incontinence / therapy*
  • Germany
  • Guideline Adherence / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Humans
  • National Health Programs / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Quality Control
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards*
  • Treatment Outcome