Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies
- PMID: 21752821
- PMCID: PMC3234546
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0829
Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies
Abstract
Humans and many non-human primates exhibit large sexual dimorphisms in vocalizations and vocal anatomy. In humans, same-sex competitors and potential mates attend to acoustic features of male vocalizations, but vocal masculinity especially increases perceptions of physical prowess. Yet, the information content of male vocalizations remains obscure. We therefore examined relationships between sexually dimorphic acoustic properties and men's threat potential. We first introduce a new measure of the structure of vocal formant frequencies, 'formant position' (Pf), which we show is more sexually dimorphic and more strongly related to height than is the most widely used measure of formant structure, 'formant dispersion', in both a US sample and a sample of Hadza foragers from Tanzania. We also show large sexual dimorphisms in the mean fundamental frequency (F0) and the within-utterance standard deviation in F0 (F0-s.d.) in both samples. We then explore relationships between these acoustic parameters and men's body size, strength, testosterone and physical aggressiveness. Each acoustic parameter was related to at least one measure of male threat potential. The most dimorphic parameters, F0 and Pf, were most strongly related to body size in both samples. In the US sample, F0 predicted testosterone levels, Pf predicted upper body strength and F0-s.d. predicted physical aggressiveness.
Similar articles
-
What makes a voice masculine: physiological and acoustical correlates of women's ratings of men's vocal masculinity.Horm Behav. 2014 Sep;66(4):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Horm Behav. 2014. PMID: 25169905 Clinical Trial.
-
Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(9):1657-75. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091484. Epub 2015 Nov 24. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016. PMID: 26360784
-
Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies are honest signals of threat potential in peripubertal males.Behav Ecol. 2014 Jul;25(4):984-988. doi: 10.1093/beheco/aru081. Epub 2014 May 12. Behav Ecol. 2014. PMID: 25024638 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual selection on human faces and voices.J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):227-43. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.658924. J Sex Res. 2012. PMID: 22380590 Review.
-
Hearing the physical condition: The relationship between sexually dimorphic vocal traits and underlying physiology.Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:983688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983688. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36425833 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?Hum Nat. 2014 Jun;25(2):200-12. doi: 10.1007/s12110-014-9194-3. Hum Nat. 2014. PMID: 24578029
-
Testosterone therapy masculinizes speech and gender presentation in transgender men.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 10;11(1):3494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82134-2. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33568701 Free PMC article.
-
Voices to reckon with: perceptions of voice identity in clinical and non-clinical voice hearers.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 3;7:114. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00114. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23565088 Free PMC article.
-
Vocal modulation in human mating and competition.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Dec 20;376(1840):20200388. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0388. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34719246 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Linking human male vocal parameters to perceptions, body morphology, strength and hormonal profiles in contexts of sexual selection.Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 4;10(1):21296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77940-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33277544 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Green S. M. 1981. Sex differences and age gradations in vocalizations of Japanese and lion-tailed monkey. Am. Zool. 21, 165–184
-
- Rendall D., Kollias S., Ney C., Lloyd P. 2005. Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 944–95510.1121/1.1848011 (doi:10.1121/1.1848011) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mitani J. C., Gros-Louis J. 1995. Species and sex differences in the screams of chimpanzees and bonobos. Int. J. Primatol. 16, 393–41110.1007/BF02735794 (doi:10.1007/BF02735794) - DOI - DOI
-
- Childers D. G., Wu K. 1991. Gender recognition from speech. II. fine analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 1841–185610.1121/1.401664 (doi:10.1121/1.401664) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Daly N., Warren P. 2001. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: speaker sex and intonation patterns. J. Sociolinguist. 5, 85–9610.1111/1467-9481.00139 (doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00139) - DOI - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
