Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):601-9.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0829. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies

Affiliations

Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies

David A Puts et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Humans and many non-human primates exhibit large sexual dimorphisms in vocalizations and vocal anatomy. In humans, same-sex competitors and potential mates attend to acoustic features of male vocalizations, but vocal masculinity especially increases perceptions of physical prowess. Yet, the information content of male vocalizations remains obscure. We therefore examined relationships between sexually dimorphic acoustic properties and men's threat potential. We first introduce a new measure of the structure of vocal formant frequencies, 'formant position' (Pf), which we show is more sexually dimorphic and more strongly related to height than is the most widely used measure of formant structure, 'formant dispersion', in both a US sample and a sample of Hadza foragers from Tanzania. We also show large sexual dimorphisms in the mean fundamental frequency (F0) and the within-utterance standard deviation in F0 (F0-s.d.) in both samples. We then explore relationships between these acoustic parameters and men's body size, strength, testosterone and physical aggressiveness. Each acoustic parameter was related to at least one measure of male threat potential. The most dimorphic parameters, F0 and Pf, were most strongly related to body size in both samples. In the US sample, F0 predicted testosterone levels, Pf predicted upper body strength and F0-s.d. predicted physical aggressiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Green S. M. 1981. Sex differences and age gradations in vocalizations of Japanese and lion-tailed monkey. Am. Zool. 21, 165–184
    1. Rendall D., Kollias S., Ney C., Lloyd P. 2005. Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 944–95510.1121/1.1848011 (doi:10.1121/1.1848011) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitani J. C., Gros-Louis J. 1995. Species and sex differences in the screams of chimpanzees and bonobos. Int. J. Primatol. 16, 393–41110.1007/BF02735794 (doi:10.1007/BF02735794) - DOI - DOI
    1. Childers D. G., Wu K. 1991. Gender recognition from speech. II. fine analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 1841–185610.1121/1.401664 (doi:10.1121/1.401664) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daly N., Warren P. 2001. Pitching it differently in New Zealand English: speaker sex and intonation patterns. J. Sociolinguist. 5, 85–9610.1111/1467-9481.00139 (doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00139) - DOI - DOI

LinkOut - more resources