National priorities partnership focus on eliminating overuse: applications to cardiac revascularization
- PMID: 21757429
- DOI: 10.1177/1062860611407686
National priorities partnership focus on eliminating overuse: applications to cardiac revascularization
Abstract
As one of several initiatives to transform health care delivery across the United States, the National Priorities Partnership has identified "eliminating overuse while ensuring the delivery of appropriate care" as a top priority. Cardiac revascularization procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), constitute one area of focus for reduction of overuse. Despite the multiyear development of clinical guidelines to define appropriate use of cardiac revascularization, substantial variability in the application of these procedures is observed. Concurrent data collection tools to support real-time clinical decision making regarding appropriateness are needed and can be used, along with financial incentives such as pay-for-performance programs and public reporting of performance information, to support more appropriate use of cardiac revascularization. Efforts to achieve more rational use of CABG and PCI should be made carefully and with the goal that patients receive the most appropriate and effective care.
Similar articles
-
Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization.Eur Heart J. 2005 Jun;26(12):1169-79. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi238. Epub 2005 Mar 31. Eur Heart J. 2005. PMID: 15802360
-
Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients.Circulation. 2006 Sep 19;114(12):1251-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.570838. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16966588 Clinical Trial.
-
Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State and Ontario.Circulation. 2010 Jun 22;121(24):2635-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926881. Epub 2010 Jun 7. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 20529997
-
Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2003 Oct;51(5):585-97. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2003. PMID: 14551526 Review.
-
ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Circulation. 2011 Sep 27;124(13):1483-502. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31822935fc. Epub 2011 Aug 29. Circulation. 2011. PMID: 21875906
Cited by
-
Collaborative quality improvement vs public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention: A comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in New York vs Michigan.Am Heart J. 2015 Dec;170(6):1227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 16. Am Heart J. 2015. PMID: 26678645 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
