Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;63(2):93-106.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

Linking sounds to meanings: infant statistical learning in a natural language

Affiliations

Linking sounds to meanings: infant statistical learning in a natural language

Jessica F Hay et al. Cogn Psychol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

The processes of infant word segmentation and infant word learning have largely been studied separately. However, the ease with which potential word forms are segmented from fluent speech seems likely to influence subsequent mappings between words and their referents. To explore this process, we tested the link between the statistical coherence of sequences presented in fluent speech and infants' subsequent use of those sequences as labels for novel objects. Notably, the materials were drawn from a natural language unfamiliar to the infants (Italian). The results of three experiments suggest that there is a close relationship between the statistics of the speech stream and subsequent mapping of labels to referents. Mapping was facilitated when the labels contained high transitional probabilities in the forward and/or backward direction (Experiment 1). When no transitional probability information was available (Experiment 2), or when the internal transitional probabilities of the labels were low in both directions (Experiment 3), infants failed to link the labels to their referents. Word learning appears to be strongly influenced by infants' prior experience with the distribution of sounds that make up words in natural languages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experiment 1: mean looking times (±1 SE) on Same and Switch test trials for infants in the HTP word and LTP word conditions.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experiment 2: mean looking times (±1 SE) on Same and Switch test trials for infants in the control condition.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Experiment 3: mean looking times (±1 SE) on Same and Switch test trials for infants in the HTP word and LTP word conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van de Weijer J. MPI Series in Psycholinguistics. 9. Nijmegen; The Netherlands: 1998. Language input for word discovery.
    1. Aslin RN, Woodward JZ, LaMendola NP, Bever TG. Models of word segmentation in fluent maternal speech to infants. In: Morgan JL, Demuth K, editors. Signal to Syntax. LEA; Mahwah, NJ: 1996. pp. 117–134.
    1. Jones D. An Outline of English Phonetics. 8th edition Heffer & Sons; Cambridge: 1957.
    1. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP, Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of speech code. Psychological Review. 1967;74:431–461. - PubMed
    1. Saffran JR, Werker JF, Werner LA. The infant's auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In: Siegler R, Kuhn D, editors. Handbook of child development. Vol. 6. Wiley; New York: 2006. pp. 58–108.

Publication types