Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 10, 119

Comparison of Effects of Diet Versus Exercise Weight Loss Regimens on LDL and HDL Particle Size in Obese Adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Effects of Diet Versus Exercise Weight Loss Regimens on LDL and HDL Particle Size in Obese Adults

Krista A Varady et al. Lipids Health Dis.

Abstract

Background: Obesity is associated with an atherogenic lipid profile characterized by a predominance of small LDL and HDL particles. Weight loss, by dietary restriction or exercise, increases LDL particle size. Whether these interventions can augment HDL size in conjunction with LDL size remains unknown.

Objective: This study compared the effects of alternate day fasting (ADF), calorie restriction (CR), and endurance exercise on LDL and HDL particle size in overweight and obese subjects.

Methods: In a 12-week parallel-arm trial, adult subjects (n = 60) were randomized to 1 of 4 groups: 1) ADF (75% energy restriction for 24-h alternated with ad libitum feeding for 24-h), 2) CR (25% energy restriction every day), 3) exercise (moderate intensity training 3 x/week), or 4) control.

Results: Body weight was reduced (P < 0.001) by ADF, CR, and exercise (5.2 ± 1.1%, 5.0 ± 1.4%, 5.1 ± 0.9%, respectively). Plasma LDL cholesterol decreased (P < 0.05) with ADF (10 ± 4%) and CR (8 ± 4%), whereas HDL cholesterol increased (P < 0.05) with exercise (16 ± 5%). Integrated LDL particle size was augmented (P = 0.01) by ADF and CR. The proportion of small LDL particles decreased (P = 0.04) with ADF only, and the proportion of large HDL particles increased (P = 0.03) with exercise only.

Conclusion: These results indicate that dietary restriction increases LDL particle size, while endurance training augments HDL particle size, with minimal weight loss. None of these interventions concomitantly increased both LDL and HDL particle size, however.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in plasma lipid concentrations after 12 weeks of treatment. Values reported as mean ± SEM. Alternate day fasting (ADF), n = 13; Calorie restriction (CR), n = 12; Exercise, n = 12; Control, n = 12. *Significantly different between groups, P <0.05 (One-way ANOVA).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 23 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Krauss RM. Lipoprotein subfractions and cardiovascular disease risk. Curr Opin Lipidol. pp. 305–311. - PubMed
    1. Asztalos BF, Cupples LA, Demissie S, Horvath KV, Cox CE, Batista MC, Schaefer EJ. High-density lipoprotein subpopulation profile and coronary heart disease prevalence in male participants of the Framingham Offspring Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(11):2181–2187. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000146325.93749.a8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheung MC, Brown BG, Wolf AC, Albers JJ. Altered particle size distribution of apolipoprotein A-I-containing lipoproteins in subjects with coronary artery disease. J Lipid Res. 1991;32(3):383–394. - PubMed
    1. Liu ML, Ylitalo K, Vakkilainen J, Nuotio I, Valkonen M, Lahdenpera S, Viikari J, Taskinen MR. Susceptibility of LDL to oxidation in vitro and antioxidant capacity in familial combined hyperlipidemia: comparison of patients with different lipid phenotypes. Ann Med. 2002;34(1):48–54. doi: 10.1080/078538902317338643. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Proctor SD, Vine DF, Mamo JC. Arterial permeability and efflux of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins assessed by in situ perfusion and three-dimensional quantitative confocal microscopy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(11):2162–2167. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000143859.75035.5a. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback