Background: Some surgical centres consider palliative resection (PR) to be superior to double loop bypass (DLB) as treatment for advanced carcinoma of the pancreatic head. We performed a retrospective study with prospectively collected data at a single centre to compare PR and DLB in regard to quality of life (QoL).
Methods: From January 1996 to September 2008, 196 patients were given palliative surgery for advanced pancreatic cancer at the University Hospital of Kiel. Forty-two patients underwent PR and 154 underwent DLB. These groups were compared with regard to survival, post-operative morbidity, and QoL. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was used to assess QoL before surgery, at discharge, three months after surgery, and six months after surgery.
Results: The median survival time after PR was 7.5 months (95% CI: 4.95-10.05) and after DLB was 6 months (95% CI: 4.98-7.02; log rank test: p = 0.066). There were no significant differences in mortality and morbidity rates (7.1% and 45.2% for PR; 3.9% and 38.3% for DLB, respectively). Assessment of QoL indicated that patients who underwent PR had more impairment of some functional metrics and increased symptoms compared to those who underwent DLB.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in survival or morbidity after PR and DLB, but patients who underwent DLB had better QoL than patients who underwent PR. Therefore, clinicians may want to reconsider the use of PR for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.