Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011;66(5):811-5.
doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000500017.

A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval

Demet Coskun  1 , Berrin Gunaydin, Ayca Tas, Gozde Inan, Hulya Celebi, Kadir Kaya
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval

Demet Coskun et al. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion on hemodynamic parameters, pain, sedation, and recovery score during oocyte retrieval.

Methods: Sixty-nine women were scheduled for oocyte retrieval. Target-controlled propofol infusion at an effect-site concentration of 1.5 μg/mL was instituted. The patients were randomly allocated to receive remifentanil at an effect-site concentration of either 1.5 (group I, n = 23), 2 (group II, n = 23) or 2.5 ng/mL (group III, n = 23). Hemodynamic variables, sedation, pain, the Aldrete recovery score, and side effects were recorded.

Results: Hemodynamic variables, sedation and pain scores and the number of patients with the maximum Aldrete recovery score 10 min after the procedure were comparable among the groups. The number of patients in group III with the maximum Aldrete recovery score 5 min after the procedure was significantly lower than that in groups I and II. One patient in group II and one patient in group III suffered from nausea.

Conclusion: Similar pain-free conscious sedation conditions without significant changes in hemodynamic parameters were provided by all three protocols. However, target controlled infusion of remifentanil at 1.5 or 2 ng/mL proved superior at providing early recovery compared to 2.5 ng/mL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean arterial pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heart rate.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Tsen LC, Vincent RD. In vitro fertilization and other assisted reproductive technology Chestnut D H, Polley L S, Tsen L C, Wong C A, Chestnut's Obstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2009305–18.
    1. Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Knox F, McNeil A. Conscious sedation and analgesia for oocyte retrieval during in vitro fertilization procedures: a Cochrane review. HumReprod. 2006;21:1672–9. - PubMed
    1. White PF. Ambulatory anesthesia advances into the new millennium. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1234–5. 10.1097/00000539-200005000-00047 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quattara A, Boccara G, Lemaire S, Köckler U, Landi M, Vaissier E, et al. Target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in cardiac anesthesia: influence of age on predicted effect-site concentrations. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:617–22. - PubMed
    1. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16. 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources