Identifying population-level indicators to measure the quality of cancer care for women
- PMID: 21791577
- DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr043
Identifying population-level indicators to measure the quality of cancer care for women
Abstract
Objective: Although there is interest in measuring the quality of cancer care, there has been limited effort to evaluate quality for specific subpopulations such as women or to examine differences in performance among women associated with sociodemographic characteristics. The objective of this study was to identify a comprehensive set of quality indicators for evaluation of the quality of cancer care received by women using administrative data.
Design: A conceptual measurement framework developed by the study investigators was used to guide literature review to identify existing quality indicators. The list of potential indicators from the literature was first reviewed by the study investigators with respect to importance and feasibility to determine a set of indicators to present to an expert panel who used a modified Delphi process to select indicators for inclusion using predetermined explicit criteria.
Setting: The Project for an Ontario Women's Health Evidence-Based Report Card.
Participants: A multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of clinicians, researchers and administrators with expertise in cancer, quality of care and/or health services research.
Main outcome measure: Set of quality indicators evaluable from administrative data.
Results: The initial literature search identified 427 indicators, of which 46 were rated as important and feasible by the study investigators. Following two rounds of ratings and an in-person meeting, the expert panel recommended 31 indicators for inclusion in the final set spanning the following areas: general indicators (three indicators), cancer screening (six), colorectal cancer (four), lung cancer (three), breast cancer (five), gynecologic cancers (five), and end-of-life care (five).
Conclusions: A comprehensive set of 31 indicators was identified to evaluate the quality of cancer care received by women that also allows assessment of gender and socioeconomic disparities in cancer care.
Similar articles
-
Developing and measuring a set of process and outcome indicators for breast cancer.Breast. 2012 Jun;21(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 6. Breast. 2012. PMID: 22056787
-
Development of a set of strategy-based system-level cancer care performance indicators in Ontario, Canada.Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr;17(2):107-14. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi007. Epub 2005 Jan 21. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005. PMID: 15665069
-
Development of measures of the quality of emergency department care for children using a structured panel process.Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):114-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3029. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 16818556
-
Development of quality indicators for care of chronic kidney disease in the primary care setting using electronic health data: a RAND-modified Delphi method.Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017 Apr;21(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10157-016-1274-8. Epub 2016 May 4. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017. PMID: 27145768 Review.
-
Quality indicators for non-small cell lung cancer operations with use of a modified Delphi consensus process.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Apr 26. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24775804 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of psychological distress on quality of care and access to mental health services in cancer survivors.Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 19;3:1111677. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1111677. eCollection 2023. Front Health Serv. 2023. PMID: 37405330 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in Cancer Screening Among Women After Introduction of National Quality Indicators.Ann Fam Med. 2021 Sep-Oct;19(5):396-404. doi: 10.1370/afm.2715. Ann Fam Med. 2021. PMID: 34546946 Free PMC article.
-
Quality indicators in lung cancer: a review and analysis.BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Aug;10(3):e001268. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001268. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 34344690 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 16;8(7):e020437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020437. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30012782 Free PMC article.
-
Expression of EGFR Is Closely Related to Reduced 3-Year Survival Rate in Chinese Female NSCLC.Med Sci Monit. 2015 Jul 31;21:2225-31. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894786. Med Sci Monit. 2015. PMID: 26230859 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
