Prognosticating in palliative care: a survey of Canadian palliative care physicians

J Palliat Care. 2011 Summer;27(2):89-97.

Abstract

Objective: To determine how palliative care physicians view the accuracy and importance of prognostication, what information they consider, and what processes they use.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to members of the Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians (CSPCP). Respondents recorded their perceptions about prognostication and the factors they considered when predicting survival. A patient scenario was described in which a prognosis was requested by two different people: a patient's daughter and a palliative care admissions coordinator.

Results: 90 responses were received from 219 CSPCP members (41.1 percent). There was moderate agreement between respondents' perceptions of their own accuracy and that of other physicians (K = 0.549). Of all the respondents, 89.9 percent believed that prognosticating was somewhat or very important. They considered clinical factors most commonly when prognosticating. A range of predictions was given for the scenario; often, the same physician gave different answers to the two people requesting a prognosis.

Conclusion: Palliative care physicians believe that prognostication is important and use clinical factors to estimate survival. They often give different estimates to different information recipients.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Canada
  • Female
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Life Expectancy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Palliative Care*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Prognosis*