Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned
- PMID: 21807649
- PMCID: PMC3198001
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000249
Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned
Abstract
Implementing health information technology (IT) at the community level is a national priority to help improve healthcare quality, safety, and efficiency. However, community-based organizations implementing health IT may not have expertise in evaluation. This study describes lessons learned from experience as a multi-institutional academic collaborative established to provide independent evaluation of community-based health IT initiatives. The authors' experience derived from adapting the principles of community-based participatory research to the field of health IT. To assist other researchers, the lessons learned under four themes are presented: (A) the structure of the partnership between academic investigators and the community; (B) communication issues; (C) the relationship between implementation timing and evaluation studies; and (D) study methodology. These lessons represent practical recommendations for researchers interested in pursuing similar collaborations.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Engaging Vulnerable Populations in Community-based Participatory Research: Lessons Learned.Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(2):227-234. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0026. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022. PMID: 35662149
-
Establishing an implementation network: lessons learned from community-based participatory research.Implement Sci. 2009 Mar 31;4:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-17. Implement Sci. 2009. PMID: 19335915 Free PMC article.
-
Major lessons learned from a nationally-based community-academic partnership: addressing sibling adjustment to childhood cancer.Fam Syst Health. 2015 Mar;33(1):61-7. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000084. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Fam Syst Health. 2015. PMID: 25581558
-
Inclusionary Trials: A Review of Lessons Not Learned.Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Dec 21;44(1):78-86. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxac007. Epidemiol Rev. 2022. PMID: 36124656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health information technology and health information exchange in New York State: new initiatives in implementation and evaluation.J Biomed Inform. 2007 Dec;40(6 Suppl):S17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Sep 7. J Biomed Inform. 2007. PMID: 17945542 Review.
Cited by
-
Health Care Worker Usage of Large-Scale Health Information Exchanges in Japan: User-Level Audit Log Analysis Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Oct 9;12:e56263. doi: 10.2196/56263. JMIR Med Inform. 2024. PMID: 39382566 Free PMC article.
-
Unmet information needs of clinical teams delivering care to complex patients and design strategies to address those needs.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):690-699. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa010. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32134456 Free PMC article.
-
Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.5334/egems.249. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017. PMID: 29881743 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes From Health Information Exchange: Systematic Review and Future Research Needs.JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Dec 15;3(4):e39. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5215. JMIR Med Inform. 2015. PMID: 26678413 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility and impact of implementing a private care system's diabetes quality improvement intervention in the safety net: a cluster-randomized trial.Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 10;10:83. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0259-4. Implement Sci. 2015. PMID: 26059264 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742–52 - PubMed
-
- US Department of Health and Human Services Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Final Rule. 75 Federal Register 44314, 2010; 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, 422 and 495. - PubMed
