Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Jul;7(7):e1002212.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002212. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

The demoiselle of X-inactivation: 50 years old and as trendy and mesmerising as ever

Affiliations
Review

The demoiselle of X-inactivation: 50 years old and as trendy and mesmerising as ever

Céline Morey et al. PLoS Genet. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

In humans, sexual dimorphism is associated with the presence of two X chromosomes in the female, whereas males possess only one X and a small and largely degenerate Y chromosome. How do men cope with having only a single X chromosome given that virtually all other chromosomal monosomies are lethal? Ironically, or even typically many might say, women and more generally female mammals contribute most to the job by shutting down one of their two X chromosomes at random. This phenomenon, called X-inactivation, was originally described some 50 years ago by Mary Lyon and has captivated an increasing number of scientists ever since. The fascination arose in part from the realisation that the inactive X corresponded to a dense heterochromatin mass called the "Barr body" whose number varied with the number of Xs within the nucleus and from the many intellectual questions that this raised: How does the cell count the X chromosomes in the nucleus and inactivate all Xs except one? What kind of molecular mechanisms are able to trigger such a profound, chromosome-wide metamorphosis? When is X-inactivation initiated? How is it transmitted to daughter cells and how is it reset during gametogenesis? This review retraces some of the crucial findings, which have led to our current understanding of a biological process that was initially considered as an exception completely distinct from conventional regulatory systems but is now viewed as a paradigm "par excellence" for epigenetic regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Timeline showing milestones in the history of X-inactivation (1950–1975).
Images are taken from http://commons.wikimedia.org, are a courtesy of the corresponding authors, or are unpublished data.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Main discoveries of the years 1975 to 2000.
(A) Timeline showing milestones in the history of X-inactivation (1975–2000). Images are taken from http://commons.wikimedia.org, are a courtesy of the corresponding authors, or are unpublished data. (B) Map of the mouse Xic.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Main discoveries of the years 2000 to 2011.
(A) Timeline showing milestones in the history of X-inactivation (2000–2011). Images are taken from http://commons.wikimedia.org, are a courtesy of the corresponding authors, or are unpublished data. (B) Kinetics of events leading to fully stable inactive state during the differentiation of female mouse ES cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hammond J., Jr Recovery and culture of tubal mouse ova. Nature. 1949;163:28. - PubMed
    1. McLaren A, Biggers JD. Successful development and birth of mice cultivated in vitro as early as early embryos. Nature. 1958;182:877–878. - PubMed
    1. Jaenisch R, Mintz B. Simian virus 40 DNA sequences in DNA of healthy adult mice derived from preimplantation blastocysts injected with viral DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71:1250–1254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature. 1953;171:737–738. - PubMed
    1. Holliday R. The induction of mitotic recombination by mitomycin C in Ustilago and Saccharomyces. Genetics. 1964;50:323–335. - PMC - PubMed