Physician specialty and carotid stenting among elderly medicare beneficiaries in the United States
- PMID: 21824938
- PMCID: PMC3213299
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.354
Physician specialty and carotid stenting among elderly medicare beneficiaries in the United States
Abstract
Background: The use of carotid stenting is rising across the United States. How physician specialty relates to its utilization rates or outcomes is uncertain.
Methods: We performed an observational analysis of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older undergoing carotid stenting between 2005 and 2007 in 306 hospital referral regions (HRRs). We first determined how frequently carotid stenting was performed by different specialists within each HRR and then used multivariable regression models to compare population-based utilization rates and 30-day outcomes for this procedure across HRRs based on the proportion performed by cardiologists, surgeons, radiologists, or a mix of specialists.
Results: In 272 HRRs where at least 15 procedures were performed during the study period, we identified 28 700 carotid stenting procedures performed by 2588 operators. While cardiologists made up approximately one-third of these operators, they were responsible for 14 919 (52.0%) procedures. Significant differences were noted in the characteristics of patients treated by cardiologists compared with other specialties, including higher rates of invasive cardiac procedures and lower rates of acute stroke or transient ischemic attacks in the 180 days prior to carotid stenting. Population-based utilization rates were significantly higher in HRRs where cardiologists performed most procedures relative to HRRs where most were done by other specialists or a mix of specialists (P < .001). In contrast, risk-standardized outcomes did not differ across HRRs based on physician specialty.
Conclusions: Carotid stenting is being performed by operators from diverse specialties. Hospital referral regions where cardiologists perform most procedures have higher population-based utilization rates with similar outcomes.
Figures
Comment in
-
Dramatic increases in carotid stenting despite nonconclusive data.Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1794-5. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.540. Arch Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22083569 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Oct 1. J Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26432281 Free PMC article.
-
Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.JAMA. 2011 Sep 28;306(12):1338-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1357. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21954477 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary Trends in Physician Utilization Rates of CEA and CAS for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis among Medicare Beneficiaries.Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;71:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.118. Epub 2020 Sep 3. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32890650 Free PMC article.
-
Opening of specialty cardiac hospitals and use of coronary revascularization in medicare beneficiaries.JAMA. 2007 Mar 7;297(9):962-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.9.962. JAMA. 2007. PMID: 17341710
-
Spending patterns in region of residency training and subsequent expenditures for care provided by practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries.JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2385-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15973. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 25490329
Cited by
-
National Patterns of Carotid Revascularization Before and After the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST).JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):51-57. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3496. JAMA Neurol. 2018. PMID: 29204653 Free PMC article.
-
Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.J Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):1029-1038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.028. Epub 2017 Feb 9. J Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 28190714 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Patients with an Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis--Medical Management, Endovascular Treatment, or Carotid Endarterectomy?Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Jan;16(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11910-015-0605-6. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26711272 Review.
-
Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Oct 1. J Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26432281 Free PMC article.
-
[Treatment reality of internal carotid artery stenosis in Germany : requirement and reality in international comparison and in light of the current S3 guidelines].Nervenarzt. 2015 Oct;86(10):1261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00115-015-4419-1. Nervenarzt. 2015. PMID: 26341691 German.
References
-
- Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics--2010 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(7):e46–215. - PubMed
-
- Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007;49(1):126–170. - PubMed
-
- Patel MR, Greiner MA, DiMartino LD, et al. Geographic Variation in Carotid Revascularization Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 2003–2006. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(14):1218–1225. - PubMed
-
- Rosenfield K, Babb JD, Cates CU, et al. Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: Training and credentialing for carotid stenting--multispecialty consensus recommendations: A report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(1):165–174. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
