The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 21852412
- PMCID: PMC3240758
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000304
The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Objective: The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded an evidence report to address seven questions on multiple aspects of the effectiveness of medication management information technology (MMIT) and its components (prescribing, order communication, dispensing, administering, and monitoring).
Materials and methods: Medline and 11 other databases without language or date limitations to mid-2010. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing integrated MMIT were selected by two independent reviewers. Reviewers assessed study quality and extracted data. Senior staff checked accuracy.
Results: Most of the 87 RCTs focused on clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry systems, were performed in hospitals and clinics, included primarily physicians and sometimes nurses but not other health professionals, and studied process changes related to prescribing and monitoring medication. Processes of care improved for prescribing and monitoring mostly in hospital settings, but the few studies measuring clinical outcomes showed small or no improvements. Studies were performed most frequently in the USA (n=63), Europe (n=16), and Canada (n=6).
Discussion: Many studies had limited description of systems, installations, institutions, and targets of the intervention. Problems with methods and analyses were also found. Few studies addressed order communication, dispensing, or administering, non-physician prescribers or pharmacists and their MMIT tools, or patients and caregivers. Other study methods are also needed to completely understand the effects of MMIT.
Conclusions: Almost half of MMIT interventions improved the process of care, but few studies measured clinical outcomes. This large body of literature, although instructive, is not uniformly distributed across settings, people, medication phases, or outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Enabling medication management through health information technology (Health IT).Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Apr;(201):1-951. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011. PMID: 23126642 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):CD009985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009985.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34822165 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing EHR Interoperability and Security through Distributed Ledger Technology: A Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 2;12(19):1967. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191967. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39408147 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How intervention studies measure the effectiveness of medication safety-related clinical decision support systems in primary and long-term care: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02596-y. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024. PMID: 38965569 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol of a patient randomized clinical trial to improve medication adherence in primary care.Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jan;136:107385. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107385. Epub 2023 Nov 11. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024. PMID: 37956792
-
Pharmacists' Perceptions on Safety Alerts of the Drug Utilization Review (DUR) in Electronic Health Records in a Tertiary Healthcare Hospital.Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;11(4):119. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11040119. Pharmacy (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37489350 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, types and severity of medication errors associated with the use of automated medication use systems in ambulatory and institutionalized care settings: A systematic review protocol.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 3;16(12):e0260992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260992. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34860852 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Truffer C, Keenan S, Smith S, et al. Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:522–9 - PubMed
-
- Handler SM, Wright RM, Ruby CM, et al. Epidemiology of medication-related adverse events in nursing homes. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2006;4:264–72 - PubMed
-
- Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998;279:1200–5 - PubMed
-
- Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen D, et al. The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA 1997;277:307–11 - PubMed
-
- Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501–4 - PubMed
