The usefulness of the five-repetition sit-to-stand (FRSTS) test was assessed with older patients in a home-care setting. Records of 45 patients (> or = 65 years old) were examined for information on FRSTS test performance. 5 patients were excluded. 23 patients were unable to complete the test. For the 17 able to complete the FRSTS test, the time required was statistically significantly greater than age-stratified norms. For patients treated in a home-care setting, inability to complete the FRSTS test clearly underscores the test's limitations and the need for alternatives.