Improving health care outcomes through personalized comparisons of treatment effectiveness based on electronic health records
- PMID: 21871040
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00612.x
Improving health care outcomes through personalized comparisons of treatment effectiveness based on electronic health records
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is one of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's significant initiatives that aims to improve treatment outcomes and lower health care costs. This article takes CER a step further and suggests a novel clinical application for it. The article proposes the development of a national framework to enable physicians to rapidly perform, through a computerized service, medically sound personalized comparisons of the effectiveness of possible treatments for patients' conditions. A treatment comparison for a given patient would be based on data from electronic health records of a cohort of clinically similar patients who received the treatments previously and whose outcomes were recorded. This framework has unique potential to simultaneously improve the quality of health care, reduce its cost, and alleviate public concerns about rationing and "one size fits all" medicine.
© 2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E23-54. Pain Physician. 2010. PMID: 20119474 Review.
-
CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):763-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 10. Int J Med Inform. 2015. PMID: 26138036
-
Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure.Stat Med. 2010 Aug 30;29(19):1963-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.3818. Stat Med. 2010. PMID: 20564311
-
Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part 2 - implications for interventional pain management.Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E55-79. Pain Physician. 2010. PMID: 20119475 Review.
-
The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Value Health. 2009. PMID: 19744291
Cited by
-
IDENTIFICATION OF QUESTIONABLE EXCLUSION CRITERIA IN MENTAL DISORDER CLINICAL TRIALS USING A MEDICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA.Pac Symp Biocomput. 2016;21:219-30. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2016. PMID: 26776188 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived impacts of health care reform on large urban health departments.J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S66-75. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000145. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015. PMID: 25423059 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources