Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;128(4):e966-72.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3074. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

Statistical uncertainty of mortality rates and rankings for children's hospitals

Affiliations

Statistical uncertainty of mortality rates and rankings for children's hospitals

Chris Feudtner et al. Pediatrics. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Hospitals are being required to report publically their adjusted mortality rates, which are then being used to rank hospitals. Our objectives were to assess the statistical reliability of the determination of a hospital's adjusted mortality rate, of comparisons of that rate with the rates of other hospitals, and of the use of those rates to rank the hospitals.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 473 383 patients discharged from 42 US children's hospitals in 2008 was performed. Hospital-specific observed/expected (O/E) mortality rate ratios and corresponding hospital rankings, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were examined.

Results: Hospitals' O/E mortality rate ratios exhibited wide 95% CIs, and no hospital was clearly distinguishable from the other hospitals' aggregated mean mortality performance. Only 2 hospitals' mortality performance fell outside the comparator hospitals' 95% CI. Those hospitals' 95% CIs overlapped with the overall comparator set's 95% CI, which suggests that there were no statistically significant hospital outliers. Fourteen (33.3%) of the 42 hospitals had O/E ratios that were not statistically different from being in the 95% CI of the top 10% of hospitals. Hospital-specific mortality rate rankings displayed even broader 95% CIs; the typical hospital had a 95% CI range that spanned 22 rank-order positions.

Conclusion: Children's hospital-specific measures of adjusted mortality rate ratios and rankings have substantial amounts of statistical imprecision, which limits the usefulness of such measures for comparisons of quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Central tendency perspective of hospital O/E mortality rate ratios with 95% CIs calculated by using frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Outlier perspective of each hospital's O/E mortality rate ratio and 95% CI plotted against the 95% CI for the set of comparison hospitals.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Performance group perspective of hospital O/E mortality rate ratios with 95% CIs.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Performance group perspective of hospital rankings based on O/E morality rate ratios with 95% CIs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rothberg MB, Morsi E, Benjamin EM, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK. Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1680–1687 - PubMed
    1. Bonow RO, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS, et al. ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circulation. 2008;118(24):2662–2666 - PubMed
    1. Comarow A. Best hospitals 2011–12: the methodology. US News and World Report. Available at: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/best-hospitals/articles/2011/07/18/... Accessed August 18, 2011
    1. Hannan EL, Kumar D, Racz M, Siu AL, Chassin MR. New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System: four years later. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58(6):1852–1857 - PubMed
    1. Lilford R, Pronovost P. Using hospital mortality rates to judge hospital performance: a bad idea that just won't go away. BMJ. 2010;340:c2016. - PubMed

Publication types