Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Nov;28(11):989-98.
doi: 10.1002/da.20898. Epub 2011 Sep 2.

Does the presence of accompanying symptom clusters differentiate the comparative effectiveness of second-line medication strategies for treating depression?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Does the presence of accompanying symptom clusters differentiate the comparative effectiveness of second-line medication strategies for treating depression?

Bradley N Gaynes et al. Depress Anxiety. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Background: We explored whether clinical outcomes differ by treatment strategy following initial antidepressant treatment failure among patients with and without clinically relevant symptom clusters.

Methods: The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial was used to examine depression remission and response in patients with coexisting anxiety, atypical features, insomnia, and low energy. We applied propensity scoring to control for selection bias that precluded comparisons between augmentation and switch strategies in the original trial. Binomial regressions compared the likelihood of remission or response among patients with and without symptom clusters for switch versus augmentation strategies (n = 269 per arm); augmentation strategy type (n = 565); and switch strategy type (n = 727).

Results: We found no statistically significant difference in remission or response rates between augmentation or switch strategies. However, symptom clusters did distinguish among augmentation and switch strategies, respectively. For patients with low energy, augmentation with buspirone was less likely to produce remission than augmentation with bupropion (remission Risk Ratio (RR): 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, response RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.03). Also, for patients with low energy, switching to venlafaxine or bupropion was less likely to produce remission than switching to sertraline (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.97; RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38-1.06, respectively).

Conclusions: Remission and response rates following initial antidepressant treatment failure did not differ by treatment strategy for patients with coexisting atypical symptoms or insomnia. However, some second-step treatments for depression may be more effective than others in the presence of coexisting low energy. Subsequent prospective testing is necessary to confirm these initial findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No authors have a conflict of interest directly related to the content of this study. The following financial relationships might be construed as potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Gaynes has received research support from AHRQ, NIH, and M-3 Information; has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb; and has developed educational presentations for MedScape and SciMed. Dr. Dusetzina was supported by AHRQ grant 5-T-32 HS000032-20. Mr. Ellis has received funding from the UNC-GSK Center for Excellence in Pharmacoepidemiology and Public Health, which is supported by unrestricted research grants from pharmaceutical companies to UNC. Dr. Hansen has received research or consulting support from AHRQ, NIH, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Dr. Farley has received unrestricted grant support from the Pfizer Foundation and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and consulting fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Novartis. Dr. Miller has received research support from AHRQ and NIH. Dr. Stürmer has received funding from the UNC-GSK Center for Excellence in Pharmacoepidemiology and Public Health, which is supported by unrestricted research grants from pharmaceutical companies to UNC. Dr. Stürmer also has received research support from AHRQ and NIH.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison P. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2002. Missing Data.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depression (revision) Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1–45. - PubMed
    1. Berman RM, Narasimhan M, Charney DS. Treatment-refractory depression: definitions and characteristics. Depress Anxiety. 1997;5:154–164. - PubMed
    1. Charney DS, Nelson JC, Quinlan DM. Personality traits and disorder in depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138:1601–1604. - PubMed
    1. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blumenthal R. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29:321–326. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms