Does the presence of accompanying symptom clusters differentiate the comparative effectiveness of second-line medication strategies for treating depression?
- PMID: 21898717
- PMCID: PMC3215789
- DOI: 10.1002/da.20898
Does the presence of accompanying symptom clusters differentiate the comparative effectiveness of second-line medication strategies for treating depression?
Abstract
Background: We explored whether clinical outcomes differ by treatment strategy following initial antidepressant treatment failure among patients with and without clinically relevant symptom clusters.
Methods: The Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial was used to examine depression remission and response in patients with coexisting anxiety, atypical features, insomnia, and low energy. We applied propensity scoring to control for selection bias that precluded comparisons between augmentation and switch strategies in the original trial. Binomial regressions compared the likelihood of remission or response among patients with and without symptom clusters for switch versus augmentation strategies (n = 269 per arm); augmentation strategy type (n = 565); and switch strategy type (n = 727).
Results: We found no statistically significant difference in remission or response rates between augmentation or switch strategies. However, symptom clusters did distinguish among augmentation and switch strategies, respectively. For patients with low energy, augmentation with buspirone was less likely to produce remission than augmentation with bupropion (remission Risk Ratio (RR): 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85, response RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.03). Also, for patients with low energy, switching to venlafaxine or bupropion was less likely to produce remission than switching to sertraline (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.97; RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.38-1.06, respectively).
Conclusions: Remission and response rates following initial antidepressant treatment failure did not differ by treatment strategy for patients with coexisting atypical symptoms or insomnia. However, some second-step treatments for depression may be more effective than others in the presence of coexisting low energy. Subsequent prospective testing is necessary to confirm these initial findings.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report.Am J Psychiatry. 2007 May;164(5):739-52. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.739. Am J Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17475733 Clinical Trial.
-
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052964. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16554526 Clinical Trial.
-
Treating depression after initial treatment failure: directly comparing switch and augmenting strategies in STAR*D.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f705d. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012. PMID: 22198447 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of bupropion for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials comparison with venlafaxine.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Sep 27;7:1053-62. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S46849. eCollection 2013. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013. PMID: 24101861 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of antidepressant nonresponders: augmentation or switch?J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 15:35-41. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998. PMID: 9786309 Review.
Cited by
-
Different depression: motivational anhedonia governs antidepressant efficacy in Huntington's disease.Brain Commun. 2022 Nov 9;4(6):fcac278. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac278. eCollection 2022. Brain Commun. 2022. PMID: 36440100 Free PMC article.
-
Obligatory roles of dopamine D1 receptors in the dentate gyrus in antidepressant actions of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine.Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;25(6):1229-1244. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0316-x. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Mol Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 30531938 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomo-Physiologic Basis for Auricular Stimulation.Med Acupunct. 2018 Jun 1;30(3):141-150. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1254. Med Acupunct. 2018. PMID: 29937968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-reported outcomes before and after treatment of major depressive disorder.Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;16(2):171-83. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.2/rcohen. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25152656 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment resistant depression: strategies for primary care.Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Jul;15(7):370. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0370-7. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013. PMID: 23712721 Review.
References
-
- Allison P. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2002. Missing Data.
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depression (revision) Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1–45. - PubMed
-
- Berman RM, Narasimhan M, Charney DS. Treatment-refractory depression: definitions and characteristics. Depress Anxiety. 1997;5:154–164. - PubMed
-
- Charney DS, Nelson JC, Quinlan DM. Personality traits and disorder in depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138:1601–1604. - PubMed
-
- Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blumenthal R. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29:321–326. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
